Air Koryo [1* airline] has a similar seating density to many 4* airlines.

suck my adls

 

V Set.

Hey look there's a maccas sign

That image makes me think of Wellington

I genuinely love pacers.

I would consider visiting DPRK by choice, and I would visit DRC just to have a look around.

Define 'spammer'

Subways?!?!

This is the surface transportation forum, not the 'below ground' one D:

AE caters to many different airline types and playing styles.

Many basic formulas work for creating airlines, even if one must be creative in how they are applied to the AE system.

Essentially what I'm saying is that one can operate all of 737spam LCCs, regional airlines and legacy carriers with some success, and I think it's imperative we avoid being left with only 737spam LCCs after AE4, for example.

Also small parts of the community.

As a note, I was unhappy with my response to the gauge thing.

I would prefer it so we could use anything from the UK, and anything of lesser gauge.

I want muh silver ferns.

As for zones, I think we should have a base area of operations, however if I want to run a train that goes outside my area I should, possibly with the restriction it must travel through (or start/end at) the base area of operations.

This is why we can't have nice things anymore.

21 June 2014

Official UnitedSkies Statement

Recently a productive member of the Airline Empires Community, FoxTrident, was removed from aaaalliance due to "inactivity". We feel that the method through which this removal was conducted was abhorrent, undemocratic and not a real representation of the alliance's views. If appropriate actions had been taken to ensure the removal was fair, including a warning and alliance wide discussion and vote, we would have less of an issue, however it is unacceptable for a harmless member to be treated unfairly by an alliance, and UnitedSkies officially condemns aaa for doing so.

We also have concerns over the lack of equality in treatment, whereby other members of aaa who had been inactive beyond the cutoff point were not also removed or reprimanded for violating the same terms. It was claimed that FoxTrident was to be 'made an example of', but this simply means 'We are going to unfairly pick someone', and in such a case it would generally be expected to pick someone that may be disliked for other reasons as well, which raises concerns over the selection process.

Furthermore we feel this incident identified severe internal communication issues with aaaalliance, as clearly no-one was willing to converse with FoxTrident about the issues at hand, and no warning was provided within a relevant time frame to the incident. This lack of interest in even attempting to fix the problem leaves aaa's motives for this action even more questionable.

When decisions are taken without the input of the alliance, the alliance will often suffer as a result. aaa simply using their now tested powers to remove even more members they merely dislike is a serious potential issue and displays reckless disregard for established democratic processes, and leads to separation of the leadership and alliance and a resultant drop in interest and participation from members, as well as a rise in dissatisfaction over members' lack of a voice.

We hope that aaa will reconsider their policy and attempt to include all of its members in future discussions and decisions, and attempt to communicate with members they may have issues with rather than simply kicking them and hoping they go away.

I think it's cute you think there's a war.

My personal preference would by Tokyo.

However, I would expect Istanbul.

I see no reason how a world designated as a spamming world would discourage spamlines in other worlds.

At worst, it could even leave the ones in other worlds to become even worse due to less need to spend time adjusting prices.

I agree.

However countries that appeared on SAA's historic route network should be excluded.

The EU is post 2000, and NZAU has some starting date.

Time based restrictions are possible, I'm not sure if expiry is.

I can assure you our private communications are very, very, very active on this matter. ;D

50 years is really too damn long.

I've always felt the R-Delta worlds are better suited to 30 year cycles.

Possibly preferential would be a grey area on the graph indicating 'blocked seats'

Thanks for your application.

We will now discuss it in the private forum, which may take some time.

While true that one can achieve an objective in a sandbox game, there is nothing to measure one's overall win. Therefore, one cannot 'win' a sandbox game, however it is possible to do 'well'.

Though interestingly, if one defines winning a non sandbox game as 'achieving a certain preset goal and being presented with a you win' message, this could be considered fairly easy. If one were to do as well in sandbox game, one still would not have won.

This brings into the question of whether one can even 'win' any game overall, but merely complete multiple pre-set objectives within it.

Why not just simulate the two key ages; The Jet Age, and the Widebody age.

Methinks we are now entering a 'low cost' age.

Which would probably be fairly easy to simulate.

Sounds like a great idea

Ehh, maybe the used-market is just one plane broker? (and so instead of "Alta sells dc-9, goes to sit on the ground waiting for buyer" it's "alta sells dc-9 to broker, broker is now responsible for finding buyer")

Considering the fees we pay for a transaction, a broker seems the obvious thing.

Possibly an option might be 'pay a broker 10% of value and get cash now, or pay a broker 0% and only get cash when a buyer buys'

title edited

Was that really necessary.

Especially considering you posted 2 minutes prior.