I think the developers should add more small worlds with various speeds and longer running times as discussed in previous posts. There are only 3 running and that's equivalent to 1 300 player world and they all run equally meaning we have to wait weeks if not moths for the worlds to reset as they are full and I noticed many people like these worlds. 

 

What do you think guys?

Agree far too much. Although I think the load created on the current servers (which are already pretty much at maximum capacity) would not be sustainable.

Hi to all!. I some time ago changed my computer and reinstalled operating system, and i have a lot of problems that i wanted to fix, but i don't know how. I was using windows 10, but i've installed windows and i think that there are some issues with brandmauer. I can't use apache channel because it's often busy and many ports are not working with other clients from the internet. Perhaps, it is a problem with cisco, but I'm not sure. So what is your opinion?

Firstly, wrong forum section, secondly I don't have any real idea. Have you tried powering off your PC and starting up again. Not simply rebooting?

AE only has a 24 day month due to the logistical nightmare a real world calendar would cause, especially with leap years.

Refreshes occur automatically within a month, and normally within a day in AE (AE Time that is)

Thanks. It would be great to work with someone of your status  .

I've read another thread posted on this very issue to no avail.

 

I'm trying to schedule a flight from Alice Springs to Perth, in Australia. When I attempt to do so, my new DC-7 has an 'incompatible schedule', preventing me from scheduling the route. Does anybody know why this could be happening?

Does it actually say this?

Have you checked your aircraft actually flies to this destination already from somewhere else.

Hi! I have a question: Why should I open a hub? I don't see any advantage, and you have to pay more...

If you know the answer, please let me know. Thanks!    

Connecting passengers, but that's about it. It's what allows spamlines to become what they become. ​But, ​for realistic airlines there is not much point in having more than about 5 at most (around 5% of a decent size airline network)

So. I used to be a pretty bad player, as many will know. I have thankfully left that past behind and now run airlines that can at the very least be considered decent. I am a member of the alliance Jetstream, which now has the strictest realism requirements of any AE alliance of all time. I am on my way to compliance with those requirements. As a member, I pride myself on all the things I used to, with a healthy dose of maturity in addition    .

My airline Blue Airlines(bad brand name but whatever), is an airline that again exploits the grey area that is much demanded between relatively expensive flag carriers and no frills airlines. Spacious configurations by clever seat design allow the usage of an 8 abreast economy configuration in an aircraft designed for 9 (A350-900). The business class is infact the design I have posted a link to below. The high density of the configuration while retaining comfort explains the seemingly high density of the A350, when it is actually very comfortable for all customers.

http://paperclipdesi.../butterfly.html

This configuration shown in the link is a configuration I wish to see deployed by airlines. I think it will decrease the cost of air travel even further, which will potentially enable an increase in comfort by airlines that pride on it (cough cough Singapore, cough cough Emirates).

The airline averages a profit margin of around 12%, which is actually quite good considering that average aircraft utilisation is just 12.2 hours, and many aircraft sit around 11.5. Long haul aircraft (A350-900 and 757) sit around 14.3. I think that Blue Airlines shows my increased skillset quite well. Running a full on full service airline is likely my next project, but seeing as only base fare economy customers do not get free meals on my flight (that too only short haul), I think I am quite close  . Now, I will leave this ramble to be judged, but I think this is worthy of consideration.

I am not qualified to vote in the poll. But this is pretty good stuff.

Are both planes operating with full green passengers?

It looks like the A300 is running full green and the 747 is about 70% blue (green is main, blue is connecting, who pay half the fare)

I would love to see Tecnam's new P2012 Traveller enter the AE World! The P2012 is a STOL capable regional/ commuter aircraft with 2 crew and 9 passenger seats.

 

POWERPLANT: 2x Lycoming TEO-540-C1A

RANGE............. 1,137 nmi

CRUISE SPEED: 190 kts (218mph)

SEATS............... 2 Crew + 9 passenger

TAKEOFF RUN.. 1,148ft

LANDING ROLL. 1,640ft

COST................ $2.3 Million USD

 

 

http://www.tecnam.co...2012-traveller/

 

CapeAir has strong orders to replace their aging Cessna's....http://www.tecnam.co...2012-traveller/

I suggested this a while back. And the suggestion got shot down and rejected pretty much immediately

The National Alliance password is national21dfghj

Get yourself banned already

Hello,

 

I am holding an Airline (Alpha Airlines) in Sandbox world (S4B) and could not able to manage it due to lack of time. Currently in rank 16th and if someone want to takeover from me and manage it properly. I am happy to share the control with you. 

If not taken already, 33020. I can give this some time.

About time

The airline is now in 4th place and rapidly dropping down the table  

Check your spelling.

Tell us which world.

Give us a link.

If it's in S4, forget it.

Do all this without being asked next time.

maybe he's american

is that allowed?

Not sure there is any demand for it anymore.

 

1. A320-200
2. A321-200
3. A319-100LR
4. 737-800
5. A319
6. 737-600
7. A318
8. 737-700
9. A321NEO
10. A320NEO
11. A319NEO
12. 737 MAX 8
13. 737 MAX 9
14. 737 MAX 7

The bolded ones are at the bottom because they're so expensive, but these below are also quite "neh, not really"...

Stupid choices: A320-100, A321-100, 737-700C, 737-900 non-ER

 

For me.

1. A319-NEO

​2. A321-NEO

​3. A320-NEO

​4. A319-100LR

5. B737 MAX 8

6. B737 MAX 9

7. B737-800

8. A318

9. B737 MAX 7

10. B737-900ER

​11. B737-700

12. B737-700C

13. B737-700ER

​I don't like Boeing very much. In game, I find Airbus aircraft more effective for my airlines  . Unless we are talking about 757s or 767s, where Airbus has no real alternative

Don't know why this would happen. I've not had that today. Have you tried using a different search engine (NOT Browser)

Wrong alliance for first time players. I applied 3 times if I recall correctly. Once as a relatively new player, once as a slightly more advanced player and once now as one of AE's most experienced players and only just got in. There's a lot of work to do if you want to prove yourself worthy

 I reckon 33-34 for economy, but can't guesstimate the others  

No. There isn't.. This is a feature that has been suggested many many many times. But that is not how a bond works.

Lolz sorry

Welcome back Eastern  

Community isn't dead, just repetitive. Every year we get new people who post the exact same things and we get ten or twenty good ones who stick around.. chat's been moved away from Airline Empires and is now in Discord.

More then that many, but it's a shamefully small minority. I'm not sure I would qualify for that group tbh