hi granite block <3

hey it's denver

very clear and not demanding at all!

if this is the worst thing you've found wrong with Airline Empires, you're having a good day.
Also this isn't a suggestion nor is it a feature request.

I'm going to assume you're talking about the A319LR, since you've provided literally no other facts or any form of information.

Simply put, they don't start delivery till 2002. It's 2000 in the game world now.

You're provided with a delivery date when you ordered

Nope, they don't get fixed, plus nobody likes a grass.

the production line is open and still producing 767s. If an airline decides they want a passenger 767, the tooling is still there and available for it. The 767 production line has not formally closed.

that discord is so ****in dead lol

Not till the EU Openskies agreement comes in

The seat limit is based on FAA/EASA regulations. Not based on available space on the cabin. B737-900 have the same amount of doors and window exits as B737-800.

Don't bother. It's like beating your head against the brick wall with these ones.

Zipp, I love you

thanks

Keep distance.

no champ

this isn't your blog bro

you have your aircraft at maximum utilisation. That isn't helping.

hi all,

quick note to say that the gallery isn't a repository for people to just take brands as they please.

it's happening a lot lately and it seems that those who 'steal' the brands are either unaware that they can't do this, or believe that it is their god given right to steal the brands.
 

Brands such as Suomi, Hong Kong Pacific and Qatariya have been created by their respective original creators and they've put significant effort into it. That isn't a licence for you to shamelessly rip of their brands for your own purposes.

Admitting that you stole the brand first, then contacting them isn't justification nor is it an excuse. Typically, if you're gonna use someone's brand, you'll contact them before you shamelessly steal it and put it onto the airline empires dot com website.

So tl;dr, stop stealing brands. capeesh? 

A quick forum search reveals the answer:

http://www.airline-e...21-xlr/?hl=a321

No he's spot on. There is physically more space in the -900, allowing a more premium cabin. Like sure the total amount of passengers is the same between -800 and -900, but the -900 should be allowed to have more C compared to the -800. As long as it doesn't exceed 189 total pax, it should be allowed to have that extra C or F capacity.

No he isn't spot on, champ.
AE works off a 189 PAX exit limit, the limitation int he game software is that is based on a full Y configuration. Now I don't see either of you volunteering to write the code to fix this free game that hasn't seen significant updates in years.
Just wait till the 739ER comes out.

Hi bud. Thanks for being rude. I know exactly how AE calculates seating, I was wondering whether there is some way for it account for available space on the aircraft. Maybe the -900 can theoretically carry 220 like the -900ER. But the total number of seats for a configuration is capped at 189.

Hi Champ,

You really don't get it, do you? AE has no way to simulate that and with no real active developments being made on the game, I suspect it never will work like that.
 

You correctly identified why you can't specifiy the 737-900 with more seats, then didn't seem to accept that's why.

You should've done research before ordering the -900.

Unfortunately, the game does not support special configurations with extra F/C passengers. This is the same reason why the A350-900ULR has lower range than the regular A350-900.

Thank you for repeating exactly what I said

you increase profit margin by making more money EASY!

On Time Performance reflects delays due to whatever reason.

Time Flown shows how long you have operated that route (three years to get "green" IIRC).

 

AFAIK there is no measure that reflects "ideal distance" for an aircraft, which has no clear definition anyway.

succinct explanation! 

so you think this is funny?

this thread was started nearly 2 years ago..