Jump to content

Photo

Stop spam airlines by not permitting any airline to schedule more than 2x the daily demand on any route

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1
mahan.kr

mahan.kr

    New Member

  • Member
  • 2 posts

Although I find this game a lot of fun, one minor detraction is spam airlines that schedule an unrealistic number of seats on a route.   I'm currently playing in one of the open worlds, and, to take just one example, the top-ranked airline has scheduled over 50,000 daily seats on the route between Galesburg and Dubuque.  I'm guessing there must be some bug in the game that allows them to reap unlimited profits by doing so.  This problem could be solved if every airline was limited to scheduling no more than 2x or 3x the number seats than the daily demand on any route.  For example, if the route A-B had a daily demand of 100 seats, then no airline could schedule more than 200 or 300 daily seats on the route.  This would allow all airlines to compete fairly.



#2
CourtingPsych0

CourtingPsych0

    Ryan Air - Ceo

  • Member
  • 87 posts

unfortunately this has been a thing for all the time ive been a part of the game, there seems to be no chance of it ever going away



#3
anthonymorgantjoe

anthonymorgantjoe

    New Member

  • Member
  • 7 posts

I strongly agree with this. Just yesterday, I saw someone schedule 20,000 seats for daily demand of a mere 36 seats, that's just ridiculous



#4
RubberDuckGaming

RubberDuckGaming

    Duck

  • Member
  • 228 posts
  • Website:https://bit.do/ducktube

User's Awards

2      

I disagree as this would detract from the freedom players have to run their airline exactly as they wish.


6DAF18E9-01AB-4C75-BA89-CF609AFA4A8D.jpeg
 
 
 
 
 

 


#5
M31MK

M31MK

    A300 Lover

  • Member
  • 87 posts

I disagree as this would detract from the freedom players have to run their airline exactly as they wish.

your playstyle takes away that freedom from everyone else



#6
da_Master_Airliner

da_Master_Airliner

    master airliner

  • Member
  • 384 posts

ummmm

 

Attached File  Screenshot 2022-05-14 6.02.29 PM.png   174.49KB   2 downloads


Chief Executive and Founder of Worldwide Alliance
msg-284924-0-43010000-1638583211.gif

 

 


#7
M31MK

M31MK

    A300 Lover

  • Member
  • 87 posts

You aren't funny.



#8
da_Master_Airliner

da_Master_Airliner

    master airliner

  • Member
  • 384 posts

You aren't funny.

Attached File  Screenshot 2022-05-15 2.17.02 PM.png   84.47KB   0 downloads


Chief Executive and Founder of Worldwide Alliance
msg-284924-0-43010000-1638583211.gif

 

 


#9
da_Master_Airliner

da_Master_Airliner

    master airliner

  • Member
  • 384 posts

also, i'm going to sit this on out.


Chief Executive and Founder of Worldwide Alliance
msg-284924-0-43010000-1638583211.gif

 

 


#10
TNT88

TNT88

    Member With The Most Trophies.

  • Member
  • 3,392 posts

User's Awards

2    14       71      

We believe in Free Market Economy. 



#11
anthonymorgantjoe

anthonymorgantjoe

    New Member

  • Member
  • 7 posts

The thing is, there are millions of routes for you to explore from

 

For example, Australia has several major as well as regional airports. If you see full route in Sydney and Melbourne, try operate international flights from Perth, Adelaide, etc.

Why squeeze for that pie of Sydney-Los Angeles when you know eventually you will lose money?

Not worth it at all in my opinion

 

Another clear example, if you are operating Los Angeles-Shanghai Pudong and that route is oversaturated, then you can consider opening Los Angeles-Shanghai Hongqiao. But some spammers, already have big profit LAX-PVG, still comes in for LAX-SHA when he clearly sees that LAX-SHA is already filled up.

LAX-SHA has 300 seats as of 2007, go grab that if it is empty. 






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users