Jump to content

Photo

Regional Aircraft


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1
KINGXyro

KINGXyro

    OMGZ I LUUUUV AE!!!

  • Member
  • 579 posts

Are regional aircraft viable? I have many of these routes that is flown by a Boeing 737-200 Adv. that has 16-90 (Y) demand so they fly 1 to 9 times per week. 

 

I have been thinking of replacing the Boeing 737's with regional airliners (such as the ATR-series). Will they actually earn more than a Boeing 737 fitted with business class in a regional route?

 

 



#2
edward99

edward99

    AE Player

  • Member
  • 52 posts

User's Awards

3   
It can really depend on which airport your flying between due to the cost of gates as slots can be so expensive

#3
KJS607

KJS607

    The O.G. Savage

  • Member
  • 3,860 posts
  • Website:https://www.thetravelsavage.com/

User's Awards

6       3   

Are regional aircraft viable? I have many of these routes that is flown by a Boeing 737-200 Adv. that has 16-90 (Y) demand so they fly 1 to 9 times per week. 

 

I have been thinking of replacing the Boeing 737's with regional airliners (such as the ATR-series). Will they actually earn more than a Boeing 737 fitted with business class in a regional route?

 

This very much depends on the era we are flying in here :P


msg-1341-0-50048700-1680446869_thumb.png

 

I did a thing: thetravelsavage.com

 


#4
sound_guy0918

sound_guy0918

    AE Know It All

  • Member
  • 163 posts

Ignoring the C-specific part (you are just diluting the demand), regional aircraft can be extremely profitable, especially the turboprops.  From a realism perspective plus the frequency bonus, 1x weekly with a 737 is better if replaced by a smaller aircraft.



#5
KINGXyro

KINGXyro

    OMGZ I LUUUUV AE!!!

  • Member
  • 579 posts

It can really depend on which airport your flying between due to the cost of gates as slots can be so expensive

I forgot to include that I'm operating the Boeing 737's on regional airports :P 

 

 

This very much depends on the era we are flying in here :P

Right, I had a hard time finding an "ideal' regional aircraft in the 80's.

 

Ignoring the C-specific part (you are just diluting the demand), regional aircraft can be extremely profitable, especially the turboprops.  From a realism perspective plus the frequency bonus, 1x weekly with a 737 is better if replaced by a smaller aircraft.

Frequency bonus? Could you explain that to me a little bit more?



#6
Selene

Selene

    AE Player

  • Member
  • 25 posts

Frequency bonus? Could you explain that to me a little bit more?

People are more inclined to fly with yopur airline if you fly more frequent to a destination.

14 Fokker 100's weekly will attract more passengers than 2 747's. I personaly opt to fly short to medium routes twice daily.



#7
Pasti

Pasti

    Fowl Play

  • Member
  • 1,032 posts

User's Awards

        
I personally try to strike a balance between frequency and profitability per plane, as while there is a positive impact on reputation for frequency, the planes flying said frequencies can often make very little as you’re taking a route with little demand and spreading said demand over a bunch of planes who might only get a few full paying passengers.

siggie3.png





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users