#1
Posted 11 October 2017 - 03:02 AM
tbh this guy spams my routes really bad
#2
Posted 11 October 2017 - 03:04 AM
Yes. Util is way too high. OMG, 20 hour full on 744?
#3
Posted 11 October 2017 - 03:09 AM
Yes. Util is way too high. OMG, 20 hour full on 744?
OMG how could this person do it? i can't believe it, this person is sooo evil omg
#4
Posted 11 October 2017 - 03:23 AM
While I'm not fond of routespammers, its worth noting that their entire expansion strategy is usually based exclusively on expansion. With a bit of route management and maintenance, going into your existing routes and cutting prices as needed to stay competitive, you should still be able to do quite well.
Profitability will drop yes, but in my experience no more than 20%, which is high but still very acceptable on decently profitable routes.
#5
Posted 11 October 2017 - 08:06 AM
#6
Posted 11 October 2017 - 08:12 AM
OMG how could this person do it? i can't believe it, this person is sooo evil omg
Nothing hard nor evil about it. It's called competitive effort. Good luck to him.
#7
Posted 11 October 2017 - 08:21 AM
Nothing hard nor evil about it. It's called competitive effort. Good luck to him.
Can you not see the sarcasm?
#8
Posted 11 October 2017 - 08:31 AM
Yes, the fact that the airlines have utilization hours over 19 and even 20 makes it a spamliner. Also how they have so many different types of planes on order.
#9
Posted 11 October 2017 - 09:08 AM
Can you not see the sarcasm?
So you're the evil one then.
#10
Posted 11 October 2017 - 09:18 AM
So you're the evil one then.
Are you christian
#11
Posted 11 October 2017 - 06:24 PM
This is a spammer. The util is insane.
#12
Posted 11 October 2017 - 06:57 PM
Wasn't aware that I was supposed to play the game as realistically as possible, but thanks for the shout out lmao.
#13
Posted 11 October 2017 - 07:02 PM
Wasn't aware that I was supposed to play the game as realistically as possible, but thanks for the shout out lmao.
Well - you don't, but it's something that would be greatly appreciated by many, especially Republic of China, who is trying to realistically role-play USAir.
#14
Posted 11 October 2017 - 07:15 PM
I can understand how people want to devote their time to creating a realistic airline or creating logos and liveries, etc. However, at the end of the day it's still a game. I think that aiming to create a 100% "realistic" US based airline straight off is a bit far fetched, considering the majority of people who create airlines base them in the US. I think that the whole "spamline" ranking people give out to other airlines is a bit ironic considering most players have their utilization's at 19+. And again, It's a game, So people have their playing styles. While I can see the frustration, remember that every game is going to be different and that your going to have competition, especially in the US.
#15
Posted 11 October 2017 - 07:24 PM
This airline is a complete spammer. Ridiculously high util, questionable routings, and legitimately awful seating configurations. Not a good example for realism (nor am I tbh )
#16
Posted 11 October 2017 - 08:21 PM
I can understand how people want to devote their time to creating a realistic airline or creating logos and liveries, etc. However, at the end of the day it's still a game. I think that aiming to create a 100% "realistic" US based airline straight off is a bit far fetched, considering the majority of people who create airlines base them in the US. I think that the whole "spamline" ranking people give out to other airlines is a bit ironic considering most players have their utilization's at 19+. And again, It's a game, So people have their playing styles. While I can see the frustration, remember that every game is going to be different and that your going to have competition, especially in the US.
I just wanted a response from you, so I am satisfied now.
#17
Posted 12 October 2017 - 03:03 AM
This airline is a complete spammer. Ridiculously high util, questionable routings, and legitimately awful seating configurations. Not a good example for realism (nor am I tbh )
You are a great example of realism IMO, especialy compared to some people. I can't even run realistic airlines other than JAL without going bankrupt, I tried to run OASIS 3 times and got broke almost instantly lol
#18
Posted 12 October 2017 - 04:00 AM
You are a great example of realism IMO, especialy compared to some people. I can't even run realistic airlines other than JAL without going bankrupt, I tried to run OASIS 3 times and got broke almost instantly lol
I find that a big reason a lot of in-game realistic airlines go bankrupt is because when they are small airlines, they don't route planes when they get them, or a few hours after, but instead wait for a day and do it for some reason.
#19
Posted 12 October 2017 - 04:07 AM
Nothing hard nor evil about it. It's called competitive effort. Good luck to him.
exactly. there are players that like to do that, like me. there are different playstyles and everyone should respect one another, unless someone spams a route with 1 dollar fare.
#20
Posted 12 October 2017 - 04:15 AM
exactly. there are players that like to do that, like me. there are different playstyles and everyone should respect one another, unless someone spams a route with 1 dollar fare.
hear hear
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: R6
Airline Empires →
General AE Discussion →
Players are cheating or exploiting any game bug???Started by ashwinmpillai, 22 Jul 2023 R6 |
|
|||
Airline Empires →
New Players and Questions →
Is 10k Demand normal?Started by Jarkii, 19 Oct 2022 R6 |
|
|||
Airline Empires →
Airline Takeover / Shared Control Requests →
airplane airlinesStarted by abandoned, 25 Nov 2021 R6 |
|
|||
Airline Empires →
Logo / Livery Requests →
Designer Showcase →
Airlines NamesStarted by JetWorldFan21, 29 Nov 2020 S1, S3C, O2, R2, R3, R6, R7, Rα |
|
|||
Airline Empires →
New Players and Questions →
what are these stars under profile photo?Started by WolfLe, 27 Apr 2020 R0, R1, R6, R5, R4, R7, R3, R2 and 2 more... |
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users