14 replies to this topic

[LebaKnees]

Hello, I would be happy if someone could suggest a replacement plane for the 767-300ER. Thanks in advance

[Hake.]

787, A350 or more 763s. Take your pick.

[sargester]

787-8 or 777-200 

[Chubby Bear]

A330-300

[HanTseng]

767-300 and 787-800 have the most similar seat numbers.

[Thepointblank]

Airbus A330-200.

[TNT88]

A300-600R

[Tesla]

787-8 ftw of manufacturer loyalty.

[~WK~]

A330, B777, A350, B787

[Flyman]

I go for B787-8

[Kirkland]

Based off my chart, I would recommend an A330-300 or 777-200

[sobochris]

id say 787-8

[konj1]

My pick would be 787-8 (or maybe A330-200) if you need to keep lower capacity (for a wide-body) and long range.

[xarxa]

787-8 is pretty much the way to go.

 

Only the 787-8, A350-800, and A350-900R are more efficient than the 767-300ER amongst planes that have a max capacity of 300 or more passengers.  The 787-8 is available half a decade earlier and is also 5-10% more efficient than those A350s.  The only real advantage the A350s offer is cost savings if you operate the A350-1000 (which will not outweigh the efficiency difference if you have a decent number of planes) and superior range (+200 and +1400 miles vs. 787-8), but these models all have a far wider range than the -300ER.

[alexSD]

B788 B763ER