Sign In
Create Account
I know this idea may sound silly but... here goes!
Could (along with terminals) runways be built (only usable by the airline that built it)? It's annoying when a (potentially profitable) route can't be flown because of runway restrictions! I know the idea is vague but could somebody get back to me on this?
#1
Posted 21 April 2012 - 05:12 AM
Proud AE member since 15th August, 2010
Planes I've travelled on:
A319, A320, A330, A380, B767, B777-200, B777-200ER, B777-200LR, B777-300, B777-300ER, ERJ-175,
Planes I've travelled on:
A319, A320, A330, A380, B767, B777-200, B777-200ER, B777-200LR, B777-300, B777-300ER, ERJ-175,
Back to top
#2
Posted 21 April 2012 - 05:16 AM
sviridovt
-
- Member
-
- 1,512 posts
AE King
- Skype Name:tim.sviridov
- Website:http://www.tech-central.org
airlines dont generally build runways though 
#3
Posted 21 April 2012 - 05:26 AM
That's whyairlines dont generally build runways though
This idea may sound silly
It can be really annoying though!
Proud AE member since 15th August, 2010
Planes I've travelled on:
A319, A320, A330, A380, B767, B777-200, B777-200ER, B777-200LR, B777-300, B777-300ER, ERJ-175,
Planes I've travelled on:
A319, A320, A330, A380, B767, B777-200, B777-200ER, B777-200LR, B777-300, B777-300ER, ERJ-175,
#4
Posted 21 April 2012 - 06:02 AM
Royen
-
- Member
-
- 1,566 posts
CEO Of Royen Airlines
- Website:http://royenairlines.tk
Well, my thoughts are that I think Airline Empires tries to be as realistic as possible with the real world, and since airlines don't build runaways I don't think this will be added or even considered!
#gogolden2015
#5
Posted 21 April 2012 - 09:18 AM
M4matthew
-
- Member
-
- 673 posts
M4Matthew
Does that not mean airports such as London City could see 747s and A380s if an airline decided to extend or build a new runway entirely?
Hardly realistic.
Hardly realistic.
#6
Posted 21 April 2012 - 03:23 PM
Obelix
-
- Member
-
- 385 posts
Fetch me a Wild Boar Dogmatix
Airport expansion is also limited by demand, available space and local regulations.
Not a real 737NG cockpit, only a SIM cockpit 
#7
Posted 21 April 2012 - 11:33 PM
I hang my head in shame 
Proud AE member since 15th August, 2010
Planes I've travelled on:
A319, A320, A330, A380, B767, B777-200, B777-200ER, B777-200LR, B777-300, B777-300ER, ERJ-175,
Planes I've travelled on:
A319, A320, A330, A380, B767, B777-200, B777-200ER, B777-200LR, B777-300, B777-300ER, ERJ-175,
#8
Posted 22 April 2012 - 01:17 AM
Amadeus Inc.
6
7
10
6
2
-
- Member
-
- 355 posts
Group CEO, Amadeus Inc.
- Website:http://pilotamrik.blogspot.com
User's Awards
6
7
10
6
2
#9
Posted 22 April 2012 - 01:30 AM
BritAbroad
-
- Data Manager
-
- 1,677 posts
Moderator and Data Collector
Particularly in the early days, the boundaries between Aeroflot, the airport's authorities, and the state for that matter, were very blurred.
#10
Posted 22 April 2012 - 03:06 AM
txaggie
-
- Member
-
- 157 posts
AE Know It All
Particularly in the early days, the boundaries between Aeroflot, the airport's authorities, and the state for that matter, were very blurred.
This.
#11
Posted 22 April 2012 - 03:22 AM
Obelix
-
- Member
-
- 385 posts
Fetch me a Wild Boar Dogmatix
Just like saying that "Cubana de Aviacion" builds runways today
Not a real 737NG cockpit, only a SIM cockpit
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
