Jump to content

Photo

Crashes

* * * * * 1 votes

  • Please log in to reply
28 replies to this topic

#21
KJS607

KJS607

    The O.G. Savage

  • Member
  • 3,860 posts
  • Website:https://www.thetravelsavage.com/

User's Awards

6       3   

I'd rather damage be more based on usage and cycles than on arbitrary age.. Posted Image
(IE, Hawaiian 737-200s would degrade faster than American mid-range ones.)

e.g. N73711 (Aloha 243) :P

msg-1341-0-50048700-1680446869_thumb.png

 

I did a thing: thetravelsavage.com

 


#22
egwrhw3rhwrh

egwrhw3rhwrh

    Boeing Master Race

  • Member
  • 318 posts

User's Awards

2   
Who the hell would fly in an ash cloud? :P Ryanair type airlines of course! Make those no. 1 airlines rage :3

And who in the name of /b/ would hijack a plane with a toy knife?

dmYeOVn.png


#23
Nick94094

Nick94094

    Chairman of Yadav Air Services Ltd

  • Member
  • 98 posts

how about older planes having a higher probability of crash because fatigue ???



#24
KJS607

KJS607

    The O.G. Savage

  • Member
  • 3,860 posts
  • Website:https://www.thetravelsavage.com/

User's Awards

6       3   

I'd rather damage be more based on usage and cycles than on arbitrary age.. :P
(IE, Hawaiian 737-200s would degrade faster than American mid-range ones.)


msg-1341-0-50048700-1680446869_thumb.png

 

I did a thing: thetravelsavage.com

 


#25
NilsOlavThePenguin

NilsOlavThePenguin

    Penguin

  • Member
  • 673 posts

Who the hell would fly in an ash cloud? :P Ryanair type airlines of course! Make those no. 1 airlines rage :3

And who in the name of /b/ would hijack a plane with a toy knife?

*cough*BA*cough* *cough*KLM*cough*

Damn, my throat is getting sore :S

#26
BzX123

BzX123

    AE Player

  • Member
  • 40 posts

Hello all...

Not sure did somebody already said but how about maintance category, not A,B,C,D categories...( but those categories would be great to.)

You will have panel "maintance" and there you will choose quality of your maintance ( mehanics,engineers..)

So you will have,,Lets say 5 categories:
-1 Worst mehanics and more probability for crash BUT much cheaper

-5 Best mehanics and almost no way for having crashed plane BUT more expensive.

2,3,4 is medium.

Sorry IF somebody already said this..

So what do you think about it?



#27
BzX123

BzX123

    AE Player

  • Member
  • 40 posts

Ok so you would be able to have 200 dc-3 in 2020 and be sure that none of them will crash in next 10 years.Sounds good...



#28
Stevphfeniey

Stevphfeniey

    Bad m*****f*****

  • Member
  • 4,249 posts
  • Website:http://stevphfeniey.tumblr.com/

There's a reason why some major airlines kept DC-3s into the 70s...

DC-3s are built like tanks


please don't kill us we're just the aquabats

 

The Best Discord Server


#29
BzX123

BzX123

    AE Player

  • Member
  • 40 posts

It was just example...Take some other like Vickers VC. 1 Viking i don't believe vicker is like tank  :ermm2: .

Anyway Il 96-400 is one of the safest planes but on AE that doesn't matter because hes fuel flow is double to A332 which have same seating config. more range, one year early on production,and double less  fuel flow.However if you're based in Russia you wouldn't get discount  ;) So lets use A332 and B764ER  :P

There should be some kind of crash OR failiure system.But without it its empty.

Best regards.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users