Airlinee

That is a solution but not really an "official" solution. A Ryanair 737 vs Turkish 737 definitely don't have the same turnaround times

It's basically the same thing. If you schedule 19hr/day utilization, you will see a negative impact on your on-time service. But if you schedule less utilization, equivalent to increasing turnaround time, you will see better on-time performance and better route reputation. 

It depends on what you want, really. But if you go for the 787, don't get the 787-10. Get the 777-200 instead.

On the shorter 757-200 flights, you could go with the A321-100, -200, NEO, LR, 737-900ER, MAX9, or MAX10. For the long range flights, the most viable replacement is probably the 767-200ER with a low density configuration. 

No he isn't spot on, champ.
AE works off a 189 PAX exit limit, the limitation int he game software is that is based on a full Y configuration. Now I don't see either of you volunteering to write the code to fix this free game that hasn't seen significant updates in years.
Just wait till the 739ER comes out.

Hi bud. Thanks for being rude. I know exactly how AE calculates seating, I was wondering whether there is some way for it account for available space on the aircraft. Maybe the -900 can theoretically carry 220 like the -900ER. But the total number of seats for a configuration is capped at 189.

I guess that’s why you do your research… i thought I heard somewhere that Boeing just wasn’t taking PAX 767 orders anymore, even if airlines wanted them.