flyguy1

More tax! The bigger the airline the more tax, maintenance ect,

Not really You won't get same profit with individual connection flights

Wat do you guys think?

Maybe this should be used for realistic worlds but when flying long distance if your route is near a hub it's automatically connects there, u get little some profit for those who connect, but most profit you get from the whole flight which equals the profit of a nonstop flight, so essentially you get more profit by connecting then a nonstopflight, this will also help give more benefits to hubs, I think there should only be 1 stop per route,
Also for realistic worlds from the time period of 1970-1999 I think ALL airlines in asia should be given a European hub, this will add realism for
Flights bound to north and south america, though the total profit equals the profit of a nonstop flight because you get no profit connecting to europe

Examples in real life- flight from LAX to KPHL on southwest , 1 connection at LAS
Flight from TPA to LAS on delta, 1 stopover at ATL

Internationally wise:
JetAirways (past, done time to time now) flight from JFK to DEL, 1 stopover at BRU

Oooo why .com?