MisterE

I know this is a nitpick, but the aircraft used in the photo for the 707-120 is technically a C-137B, though it used to be a VC-137B.

There is a problem in the fuel cost calculation.

 

I have two types of aircraft on my SFO-ORD route.

The 707-120 has a fuel flow of 34,720 and a fuel cost per leg of 61,760.

The DC 8-61 has a fuel flow of 35,360 and a fuel cost per leg of 57,736

 

Call me crazy, but I would think that the aircraft with the lower fuel flow should have the lower fuel cost.

In R0 there is a flaw in the DAL political restriction.

Once you establish a route conforming to the DAL restrictions limiting long flights to aircraft that can carry 56 passengers or fewer, one can swap out the aircraft for a larger one that does not meet the restrictions. For example, I had established a route between DAL and SEA with a Martin 4-0-4 40 seats, and later changed it for a DC-10-40 399 seats.

Occasionally when I swap out an aircraft on a route the revenue an cost numbers are not updated.

As in the example attached. I swapped a 747-200C for a 707-320C and the R/T Profit remained the same.

This seems to happen about every 1 in 8 swaps.

Airport NQN Nequen - Presidente Peron, is showing as being located about 300mi off Long Island New York. It looks like the latitude is listed as north rather than south.