25 replies to this topic

[Moldova96]

I have been editing the demand at airports in the United States here are the loses and gains for each state:

Alabama: Loss of 5 million seats
Arizona: Gain of 1 million seats
Arkansas: Loss of 2 million seats
California: Loss of 50 million seats
Colorado: Gain of 5 million seats
Connecticut: Loss of 5 million seats
Delaware: No Change
Florida: Gain of 16 million seats
Georgia: Loss of 43 million seats
Hawaii: Loss of 12 million seats
Idaho: Loss of 2.5 million seats
Illinois: Loss of 40 million seats

More states data will be edtited tomorrow. If you want to have you say please feel free.

[Moldova96]

This is because many of the larger airport were operating at 2x too much demand. Take Atlanta it was offering 90- million demand when it should have been around 49 million.

[9M-TKS]

You mean loss of xxx seats as in loss of xxx PAX per year?

[sviridovt]

This is because many of the larger airport were operating at 2x too much demand. Take Atlanta it was offering 90- million demand when it should have been around 49 million.

but then there are about 2x as much airlines in AE then in real life

[SirMoo]

but then there are about 2x as much airlines in AE then in real life

But it's also about 100x more profitable in AE than in Real Life. Airlines expand quickly here. For those of us who like realistic this is a nice addition.

Moldy, did you actually use legit data sources for your pax numbers or?

I also noticed you're missing Alaska in that list.

[sviridovt]

But it's also about 100x more profitable in AE than in Real Life. Airlines expand quickly here. For those of us who like realistic this is a nice addition.

Moldy, did you actually use legit data sources for your pax numbers or?

I also noticed you're missing Alaska in that list.

if you think about it, its realistic because there arent as many airlines in real world, so having more demand in AE makes sense

[SirMoo]

if you think about it, its realistic because there arent as many airlines in real world, so having more demand in AE makes sense

More demand for more airlines realism does not make. There are TONS of airlines actually... Just few make it big. AE simply needs to be harder. Then it will balance out.

[sviridovt]

More demand for more airlines realism does not make. There are TONS of airlines actually... Just few make it big. AE simply needs to be harder. Then it will balance out.

there are a ton airlines, however unlike AE, its more balanced out through out the world (where as in AE, probably 75% of all airlines are based in Europe or US)

[SirMoo]

there are a ton airlines, however unlike AE, its more balanced out through out the world (where as in AE, probably 75% of all airlines are based in Europe or US)

There are simply more Regional Airlines. For instance, United Express is 8 airlines using the same name. The reason why AE has more trouble is simply because there are 8 (though more) airlines not operating in agreement.

[sviridovt]

There are simply more Regional Airlines. For instance, United Express is 8 airlines using the same name. The reason why AE has more trouble is simply because there are 8 (though more) airlines not operating in agreement.

but arent that many regional airlines in AE, most operate on international level

[PacificAirways]

I normally operate a regional and international franchise for my airlines. Im starting up Pacific and Pacific Connect

[Moldova96]

I am using the most recent FAA data from last year for this. I have not got round to Alaska because I forgot about them.

[conmanflyer]

why can't you do this in the next version, this is bull straight and simple. 900 routes kinda get F'd up with it.

[conmanflyer]

PS bump up LAL to the same as HIO or higher. because HIO does not have airline service

[Conor]

why can't you do this in the next version, this is bull straight and simple. 900 routes kinda get F'd up with it.

1. the next version may not arrive until next year
2. It is a beta, you knew what you signed up t when you joined. Things will change in a beta and quite regularly as well. ait id bound to mess with your routes but again thats what you signed up for

[Kngkyle2]

Realism is of utmost importance for me so I welcome this change.

[conmanflyer]

realism is for the realistic world, not for open, lol

[SirMoo]

realism is for the realistic world, not for open, lol

...So you'd want 100 billion pax at all airports? Open IS realistic, it's just not strict. AE is already too unrealistic in some aspects.

[Moldova96]

Newest reductions in possible passengers:

Indiana -7.5 million possible passengers
Iowa -1.4 million possible passengers
Kansas -1 million possible passengers
Kentucky -7.6 million passengers

[Moldova96]

Louisiana -12 million
Maine -1.5 million
Maryland -6 million
Massachusetts -11 million
Michigan -18 million
Minnesota -14 million
Mississippi -1.5 million
Missouri -15 million