45 replies to this topic

[bolli]

its a flight sim... so it looks the same because its both meant to look like real life

[9M-TKS]

Microsoft is still relatively quiet about the details

Hope it includes the less common aircraft like the DC10. It's a pain looking for a decent DC10 panel

[sviridovt]

didnt read all of the topics here (way too lazy ) but here is what I think of MS Flight:

1. It better run lag-less (I have a very decent computer and FSX lags (although I do have almost all settings set at high))
2. It better be good
3. It better have mouse-yoke
4. It better be as good as they say it is
5. It better be fairly priced.

[bolli]

didnt read all of the topics here (way too lazy ) but here is what I think of MS Flight:

1. It better run lag-less (I have a very decent computer and FSX lags (although I do have almost all settings set at high))
2. It better be good
3. It better have mouse-yoke
4. It better be as good as they say it is
5. It better be fairly priced.

1. You are joking? It will require a supercomputer
2. if you have said supercomputer, yes it will be
3. Yes it will have. MS made that mistake in 2004
4. See 2.
5. I can imagine it will be high prices to start off with, however it should fall in price after a while

[james767]

It not bad for low but for best game play you will need 6GB RAM 10 GB HARD DRIVE SPACE 3.3GH CPU AND GOOD GPU. BUT IT LIKE THE ONE FOR FSX BUT ALL WITH MORE RAM 4 TO 6GB

[9M-TKS]

didnt read all of the topics here (way too lazy ) but here is what I think of MS Flight:

1. It better run lag-less (I have a very decent computer and FSX lags (although I do have almost all settings set at high))
2. It better be good
3. It better have mouse-yoke
4. It better be as good as they say it is
5. It better be fairly priced.

You're lising what everyone wants, but not they may not be realistic.