American Airlines
#1
Posted 06 April 2007 - 10:16 PM
Airbus A319-100 3 0.00 22.00
Airbus A321-200 4 0.00 22.00
Boeing 737-900 8 0.00 22.00
Boeing 757-300 2 0.00 22.00
Bombardier Q400 2 0.00 22.00
Embraer ERJ-135ER 1 0.00 22.00
Embraer ERJ-145ER 1 0.00 22.00
Saab 2000 8 0.00 22.00
Airbus A330-300 2 0.00 22.00
Fleet Wide 31 0.00 22.00
#2
Posted 06 April 2007 - 10:32 PM
And next time before accusing me for NO REASONS, get some proofs!
#3
Posted 06 April 2007 - 10:34 PM
#4
Posted 06 April 2007 - 10:49 PM
Guess hes just being safe making sure no one is taking advantages of any big bugs (not that you did anything, from what I see.)
#5
Posted 06 April 2007 - 10:54 PM
However, this is more of an issue that should have been addressed privately and not publicly before having more information.
I believe that American has learned from his mistake two rounds ago and is playing 100% fair now
#6
Posted 06 April 2007 - 11:30 PM
I was wondering how he got to #1 at LAX so quick. He doesn't have the volume needed with holding ATL still. Then I noticed something strange. All of his aircraft are maxed on hours. That sounds so familiar. I wonder how many hours each aircraft is actually running?
Airbus A319-100 3 0.00 22.00
Airbus A321-200 4 0.00 22.00
Boeing 737-900 8 0.00 22.00
Boeing 757-300 2 0.00 22.00
Bombardier Q400 2 0.00 22.00
Embraer ERJ-135ER 1 0.00 22.00
Embraer ERJ-145ER 1 0.00 22.00
Saab 2000 8 0.00 22.00
Airbus A330-300 2 0.00 22.00
Fleet Wide 31 0.00 22.00
was it not the split screen issue with ac running over the 22 hours?
#7
Posted 07 April 2007 - 12:26 AM
was it not the split screen issue with ac running over the 22 hours?
Not Quite. I couldn't find the thread I wanted where a few airlines had aircraft running at 30-60 hours each. This is close though.
http://forums.airlin...read.php?t=2086
#8
Posted 07 April 2007 - 05:52 AM
Not Quite. I couldn't find the thread I wanted where a few airlines had aircraft running at 30-60 hours each. This is close though.
http://forums.airlin...read.php?t=2086
This bug was if I think back reported in the BUG Tracking software also :puzzled:
http://www.airlineem...y_view_page.php
But this is one that you may look at
http://img228.images...untitled2yq.jpg
and here is the thread you may be thinking of
http://forums.airlin...read.php?t=2308
#9
Posted 09 April 2007 - 02:05 AM
#10
Posted 09 April 2007 - 02:50 AM
The MCO-LHR im sure is RT, the LAX-LHR has to be one way, and with the tiem remaining on the A/C the other two routes can easily be done 1-wayEti how is it that your currently flying with your 2 lonely A333's MCO-LHR (RT, unless your a fool), MCO-PIT (assuming oneway), LAX-PIT (Assuming one way again), and LAX-LHR one way???
#11
Posted 09 April 2007 - 02:51 AM
#12
Posted 09 April 2007 - 02:53 AM
Banana, i know you are a reputable airline, but maybe you should check the logic behind your argument before you start throwing balls blinfolded into right field
#13
Posted 09 April 2007 - 03:30 AM
Here are the routes I'm flying with my 330:
#14
Posted 09 April 2007 - 04:14 AM
just because he screwed up before doesnt mean he is doing stuff now. stop the witch hunt
#15
Posted 09 April 2007 - 04:19 AM
#16
Posted 09 April 2007 - 07:11 AM
Why in the hell I just received a message saying that I'm cheating when I'm not ? Who is the idiot that send me that?
Hey, easy there my son called one of the anti-cheat police an idiot and he was removed / IP Banned / and hit with a massive fine $$$$$$$$$ so large that even Donald Trump couldnt find enough cash to help him out
#17
Posted 09 April 2007 - 07:34 AM
Just go on the rankings page and click on some airlines and ull see that it seems to be a general trend.
#18
Posted 09 April 2007 - 07:48 AM
It would be right to say American is not the online airline.
Just go on the rankings page and click on some airlines and ull see that it seems to be a general trend.
What does it has to do with being online or not? The thing is that I'm not cheating. End of The Line!
#19
Posted 09 April 2007 - 08:12 AM
What does it has to do with being online or not? The thing is that I'm not cheating. End of The Line!
My mistake.. meant to say 'only' not online.. guess i stuffed that up... (if u look at my previous post to this, it is fixed up now)
And in regards to the anti-cheat police, they do a job, people may not like it, but if they got a query, they ask. Thats what they do.. it can happen to anyone, so dont think ur singled out.
There has been many players that have been query and either allowed to continue because they have come up clean or being fined or banned.
#20
Posted 09 April 2007 - 08:15 AM
My mistake.. meant to say 'only' not online.. guess i stuffed that up... (if u look at my previous post to this, it is fixed up now)
And in regards to the anti-cheat police, they do a job, people may not like it, but if they got a query, they ask. Thats what they do.. it can happen to anyone, so dont think ur singled out.
There has been many players that have been query and either allowed to continue because they have come up clean or being fined or banned.
I understand that they have a job to do, I'm just scared of being ban for no reasons.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users