10 replies to this topic

[kellykeli]

Let me explain: there are some airports that are either runway limited or... well, in this case, just runway limited. I.e. Burbank has a ~6800 ft long runway, which prevents most widebodies from operating there. However, the B767-200ER, with the right runways, is an aircraft that perfectly matches the demand at BUR on long haul flights, therefore, that is a good "aircraft-airport combination"

Another example can be the A380 and LAX; the two go together very well.

[da_Master_Airliner]

dubai (dxb) and the a380

[kellykeli]

dubai (dxb) and the a380

Sir Tim Clark? Is that you?

[da_Master_Airliner]

Sir Tim Clark? Is that you?

nope

[Boeing 777-236ER]

Heathrow and the 747. No explanation needed. 

[da_Master_Airliner]

Heathrow and the 747. No explanation needed. 

YEEEESSSSS!!!!!!

[kellykeli]

Heathrow and the 747. No explanation needed. 

Heathrow and Concorde, maybe? ;3

[Planespotterindia]

AN-226 DEL

[secret_0823]

777-300ER and Singapore
787-9/8 and Auckland

[Thatflyerguy]

767-200er is pretty good for just about anything.

 

also, 757200M is brilliant with cairo, what with the hundreds upon hundreds of routes within 3800 miles of cairo that have enough demand for it.

[KMRobinson318]

Luton, A350-900. Overlooked by just about every long-haul competitor, whereas trying to serve LHR I frequently get dragged into price wars...