Jump to content

Photo

777 300 replacement?


  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

#1
StarLux

StarLux

    777X Fanclub

  • Member
  • 183 posts

...



#2
gavonious.malaysia

gavonious.malaysia

    Lord Toomuchtimeonhands

  • Member
  • 27 posts

User's Awards

2         

I use 777-300ERs and 747-8Is as replacements for most 777-300s. The 747-8I has a slightly larger max seating (55 more) but is close enough to be mostly interchangeable with 773s and 773ERs. I usually don't need to replace 773s because of how late they become available in most games, i.e. they are still pretty new by the time the game ends.



#3
StarLux

StarLux

    777X Fanclub

  • Member
  • 183 posts

well in R6.. XD im gonna prbly replace them with the 777 300 XD cuz 300ER needs more runways and 747 8 is reserved for the a340 600 and i cant order 130 more of those^^



#4
Tesla

Tesla

    Inactive

  • Member
  • 2,392 posts

I would have said 787-10s but they are more in line with 200 series 777s and aren't actually that economical O_O . I would have to say 777-300, because there is nothing quite like it.



#5
StarLux

StarLux

    777X Fanclub

  • Member
  • 183 posts

thats the problem^^ actually i think an older version of the 787 10 was 550 pasangers but they changed it to 440



#6
Tesla

Tesla

    Inactive

  • Member
  • 2,392 posts

thats the problem^^ actually i think an older version of the 787 10 was 550 pasangers but they changed it to 440

*510*

 

Yh they did



#7
HanTseng

HanTseng

    AE Luver

  • Member
  • 335 posts

User's Awards

21    7    6    3   

There is not really any aircraft to replace the 777-300, as there's not a lot in the 550 seat range. I would replace it with news 777-300s, or buy 777-300ERs for long range routes. 


post-80164-0-49508800-1518631495.png

 

BV6atB1.png

 

 

vxfPiWg.png


#8
StarLux

StarLux

    777X Fanclub

  • Member
  • 183 posts

There is not really any aircraft to replace the 777-300, as there's not a lot in the 550 seat range. I would replace it with news 777-300s, or buy 777-300ERs for long range routes. 

ill use the 777 300

the ER version is useless in my eyes cuz it has like 100miles more range but needs more runway lenght and is slightly more expensive but when u order 130 of those it is a difference of about 1/2 billion $ so... yeah



#9
Jamesthomeson

Jamesthomeson

    Desperate to Fly

  • Member
  • 451 posts
I either use the 747-8 or just buy new 777-300s because it's a very profitable aircraft.
t4lPIvQ.jpgUjfJ0sC.png

#10
Maestro69

Maestro69

    El Original Mod, AE Beta Tester

  • AE Moderator
  • 4,005 posts

User's Awards

     

Not knowing the game world or year that game world is in, i would suggest replacing your existing fleet with new 777-300ER.

 

However in saying that, i think you will fine that perhaps replacing them with 748s would result in an increase in fuel usage and seat costs against the 777-300ER.

 

But i would also suggest the 787-10, depending on the game world, to replace the 777-300ER. While not having the same seat capacity as the 777-300ER, you would see a benefit in less fuel usage and less operational costs in using a newer aircraft, but needed to increase frequency to match the current capacity offered by your existing 777-300ER fleet.


dleLlDN.png?raw=1


#11
Tesla

Tesla

    Inactive

  • Member
  • 2,392 posts

Not knowing the game world or year that game world is in, i would suggest replacing your existing fleet with new 777-300ER.

 

However in saying that, i think you will fine that perhaps replacing them with 748s would result in an increase in fuel usage and seat costs against the 777-300ER.

 

But i would also suggest the 787-10, depending on the game world, to replace the 777-300ER. While not having the same seat capacity as the 777-300ER, you would see a benefit in less fuel usage and less operational costs in using a newer aircraft, but needed to increase frequency to match the current capacity offered by your existing 777-300ER fleet.

787-10 is really uneconomical. You may as well fly 9s or even 8s instead because of how little difference there is in seating capacity.



#12
dua

dua

    *restarting*

  • Member
  • 688 posts

787-10 is really uneconomical. You may as well fly 9s or even 8s instead because of how little difference there is in seating capacity.

I find that too just use the -9 its the best one from all of them :)


gaBp8XE.png


#13
zortan

zortan

    AE Winner

  • Member
  • 2,505 posts
  • Website:http://aeronauticsonline.com

Yeah - I would use the 747-8I because the 747 is the only royalty in the sky :) and it is larger, which gives you more flexibility on your routes - you can just give more legroom if you don't need more seats!



#14
Corticera

Corticera

    Queen of Inactivity

  • Member
  • 90 posts

User's Awards

2      

Move to 787s or A350s. The fuel efficiency will get you more revenue than your 773s. I would also progressively replace larger planes with many smaller planes, because this saves more money.


RcuaXvf.png


#15
zortan

zortan

    AE Winner

  • Member
  • 2,505 posts
  • Website:http://aeronauticsonline.com

Move to 787s or A350s. The fuel efficiency will get you more revenue than your 773s. I would also progressively replace larger planes with many smaller planes, because this saves more money.

you could..... but they have less range and seat less. I personally really would switch to 748



#16
Corticera

Corticera

    Queen of Inactivity

  • Member
  • 90 posts

User's Awards

2      

you could..... but they have less range and seat less. I personally really would switch to 748

Realistically, the 773 has half the range as in this game, and also realistically, all airlines are switching to smaller, more fuel efficient planes with good range. The age of A380 and 747 is over.


RcuaXvf.png


#17
zortan

zortan

    AE Winner

  • Member
  • 2,505 posts
  • Website:http://aeronauticsonline.com

Realistically, the 773 has half the range as in this game, and also realistically, all airlines are switching to smaller, more fuel efficient planes with good range. The age of A380 and 747 is over.

Maybe so - But i'm a 747 fan for life :)



#18
spenceo

spenceo

    New Member

  • Member
  • 6 posts

User's Awards

2         

The 777-300, in my opinion, is the best long-haul airplane here, fuel consumption is very good, considering it can carry 550 PAX, but the only flaw is it needs a 11000ft runway.



#19
LJ Aviation

LJ Aviation

    The Official Dabber of AE

  • Member
  • 321 posts

User's Awards

2      

Dont replace them. You do not need to unless your route is losing money. Then switch to new 773 or A350 or any other widebody out there. Most of them are viable.


PKInW0N.jpgPgdni23.jpg

 

 

 

 
 




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users