Jump to content

Photo

User-Making Aircraft

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1
Hanjin Globe

Hanjin Globe

    HANJIN Global, Hanjin KAL

  • Member
  • 55 posts

How about making aircraft user-self?

 

It will be possible in small aircraft.....

 

Like KAI (Korea Aerospace Industry) or Korean Air Aerospace and Universe Aircraft making Dep. (only for rear fuselase)

 

User-Making Aircraft can make "only fuselase". It means you must buy engine from RR or GE etc....

 

If, User want to make aircraft or research aircraft, It will be cost huge money for airline manufactures....

 

<Cost for making aircraft>

Engine type : 

-Jet : x40 / -Prop : x30 / -Helicopter : x10

 

Pax

- 1~10 : $10,000,000 / - 11~50 : $110,000,000 / - 51~125 : $3,500,000,000 / - 126~355 : $ 6,000,000,000 / - 356~450 : $ 21,000,000,000 / - 451~635 : $ 41,000,000,000 / - 635~800 : $ 185,000,000,000 / - 801 ~ 1255 : $ 4,805,000,000,000

 

Engine 

- 1 : x2 / -2 : x5 / -3 : x11(more research for build 3engine) / -4 : x10 / 5: x15 / 6 :x20 / 7:x27 / 8:x30

 

Wing

1~10m : x20 / 11~20m : x30 / 20~40m : x40 / 41m~ : x55

 

Wide

~3m : x2 / 3~5 : x5 , 6~10 : x20 / 11~14m : x30 / 15~ : x50

 

( It will be cost every month before launch in market.)

eg) A320 : Max passenger: 180, 6000M$ (x 2Engine) x5 (3.7 wide) x5 (34.1 wing) x40 = 6,000,000M$ per research month

 

Manufactures can select sell partner

(only alliance or Only for ME , or Everyone can buy....)

 

Give your opinions... Thank you for read all my topic....



#2
compton

compton

    AE Luver

  • Member
  • 256 posts

User's Awards

5    2    6   

It is a good idea, but it goes against the realism that is so important to Airline Empires. 


vZOC42i.png


#3
tyriq

tyriq

    AE Player

  • Member
  • 41 posts
It's a good concept, but it's not realistic, although AE does have unrealistic worlds like the no leasing, and the one hub, and the no political restrictions world.

This concept would be better of with its own world, rather than the current "realistic" worlds.

#4
KJS607

KJS607

    The O.G. Savage

  • Member
  • 3,860 posts
  • Website:https://www.thetravelsavage.com/

User's Awards

6       3   

Nope. For the said reason above, this would go against what AE is, however is a nice concept :P


msg-1341-0-50048700-1680446869_thumb.png

 

I did a thing: thetravelsavage.com

 


#5
bAnderson

bAnderson

    Timeless

  • Member
  • 2,139 posts

This is good for any other game..


wgOP4y0.jpg


#6
DeltaIVSSBN

DeltaIVSSBN

    Project 667BDRM

  • Member
  • 213 posts

User's Awards

2    2   

Yeah it should be in its own special world. Maybe two or three of those worlds because they one world would probably be very crowded.



#7
Preston

Preston

    AE Luver

  • Member
  • 252 posts

It is a good idea, but it goes against the realism that is so important to Airline Empires. 



#8
zortan

zortan

    AE Winner

  • Member
  • 2,515 posts
  • Website:http://aeronauticsonline.com

Cool, but sort of ruins the point of an airline. I have a suggestion, which is that the developers go and make it so that within a game world, people can be multiple things other than an airline, this included.



#9
Captain aj

Captain aj

    Planes..Planes..AandPlanes...

  • Member
  • 14 posts

I think this is a cool idea. It will add more some sort of realism to the game, althought it might ruin the system of some game world's. If the developer add this concept and bring it to the game. I would really really love this game. :lol:



#10
HanTseng

HanTseng

    AE Luver

  • Member
  • 335 posts

User's Awards

21    7    6    3   

This is a good idea, but it's too different from Airline Empires. Maybe it could work well in another game or in specific new and special game worlds.


post-80164-0-49508800-1518631495.png

 

BV6atB1.png

 

 

vxfPiWg.png


#11
sjwjej

sjwjej

    New Member

  • Member
  • 9 posts

How about make Vitual-Realism server?

 

It can management paper plan aircraft like B2747 or 2707.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users