11 replies to this topic

[ian_m.03]

In my airline, Midway Airlines, I have 29 767-300ER's delivered between 1991 and 2001, plus 15 767-400ER's delivered between 2001 and 2003. My game world is in 2014, and it ends in a year. My -300ER's have Pratts and my -400's have GE engines. I want to replace the older (1991-1996) -300ER's, which all have winglets, but they're pulling my average fleet age down, plus the maintenance price is getting high. I don't want to buy new -300ER and -400ER aircraft because that's not realistic. What aircraft should I use, in this year, with fuel burn better than 38,000 and realistic capacity that can replace the -300ER's on primarily TATL routes out of PHL, MSP, DTW, and MCO?

[gavonious.malaysia]

My only thoughts are B788s or A332's. The latter doesn't fit the less than 38000 fuel burn but is still a pretty good option given its range and capacity. I highly recommend the B788 because it has lower burn, better range, and a slightly larger capacity.

[JP.]

Boeing 787-8

[jmfsam]

Personally I'd use a 787, less fuel burn, and as mentioned a better range. Also a sleek and nice addition to any fleet

[TheBlock]

A 787 would be the best option, however a A330 or another 767-400ER would be cheaper to buy.

[TheBlock]

A 787 would be the best option, however a A330 or another 767-400ER would be cheaper to buy.

[bAnderson]

I use the 787s, even though the 763 never goes out of production..

[WorldWide Ltd. CEO]

id say the b787 or the A330 and maybe even the A350

[Airboss777]

You game world ends in a year. less by now. Who cares?

[Stevphfeniey]

Concordes

[RJM]

787 has been my replacement for 767s.

[LJ Aviation]

787