Sign In
Create Account
Which one would you phase out first (despite the fact that the 767 has a larger range, looking at maintenance costs and fuel)?
A300 vs 767-300(ER)
Started by raraoul, Feb 22 2016 10:10 AM
Back to top
#2
Posted 22 February 2016 - 12:09 PM
#4
Posted 22 February 2016 - 09:38 PM
Tesla
-
- Member
-
- 2,392 posts
Inactive
I would never fly the A300. It is less modern, early versions are not great on fuel, and it is a worse plane in general. Also, tail fin snapping off!
#5
Posted 23 February 2016 - 12:06 AM
Stevphfeniey
-
- Member
-
- 4,249 posts
Bad m*****f*****
- Website:http://stevphfeniey.tumblr.com/
I would never fly the A300. It is less modern, early versions are not great on fuel, and it is a worse plane in general. Also, tail fin snapping off!
767s have a propensity to crash into buildings.
#7
Posted 03 March 2016 - 04:34 PM
bAnderson
-
- Member
-
- 2,139 posts
Timeless
I would never fly the A300. It is less modern, early versions are not great on fuel, and it is a worse plane in general. Also, tail fin snapping off!
767s have a propensity to crash into buildings.
I think the real problem here is AA.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
