Noticing that there are for example both a 757-200 and a 757-200M in the aircraft list. Is there a difference in those models except for price, engines, etc.? Which one do you prefer?
Normal or "M"-version
#1
Posted 04 May 2014 - 07:13 PM
#2
Posted 04 May 2014 - 07:21 PM
#3
Posted 04 May 2014 - 08:07 PM
The 757-200M Variant is a Combi/Convertible Version just like with the 747-400M. Looking in game I would say get the normal version as it's cheaper and more engine options. if cargo was implemented in game then maybe the M would be more useful but as there will be no cargo till AE4 or AE5, just stick to the normal version.
#4
Posted 05 May 2014 - 12:33 PM
There is a difference between the 2 aircraft. The M version's fuel flow is 3000 higher.
Edited by Hake#Yay5k!Wastefish, 05 May 2014 - 01:25 PM.
#5
Posted 05 May 2014 - 01:04 PM
In wich world?There is a difference between the 2 aircraft. The M version's fuel flow is 3000.
#6
Posted 05 May 2014 - 01:25 PM
3,000 higher than the normal variant.
#7
Posted 05 May 2014 - 02:08 PM
More importantly, the M variant is delivered every 2 weeks instead of every 3...
#8
Posted 05 May 2014 - 04:52 PM
More importantly, the M variant is delivered every 2 weeks instead of every 3...
Before I saw this I thought the only advantage of the 752M was for bragging rights of being launch customer or being in the top 5 operators of the aircraft.
#9
Posted 05 May 2014 - 05:13 PM
#10
Posted 05 May 2014 - 05:21 PM
Which should it be? 2 weeks seems correct since it is narrow-body.
#11
Posted 05 May 2014 - 05:40 PM
Which should it be? 2 weeks seems correct since it is narrow-body.
I have changed it to 3 weeks because all 757s are 3 weeks. Yes, the 757 is a narrowbody, but it's in a different class than 737/A320s, and historically the 757 production rate was much lower than 737s. It's similar in seat count to the A321, but the A321 is a stretched A320 but the 752 is not a stretched 739.
#12
Posted 05 May 2014 - 05:51 PM
OK thanks Yuxi...great job as always.
#13
Posted 05 May 2014 - 06:12 PM
OK so now that there is a negligible difference betweeen the two, does it make sense to carry them both?
#14
Posted 05 May 2014 - 08:01 PM
Simply for having a special plane in your fleet, realisms sake and being able to brag a bit: yes
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users