And let the country go to hell while the incumbent ruins it? No thankss.In this case i would select not voting.
Paul Ryan
Started by Kirkland, Aug 11 2012 08:36 PM
#21
Posted 14 August 2012 - 05:24 PM
It's really me, now. #backtoAE
#22
Posted 14 August 2012 - 09:02 PM
which would you say that is fox?
#23
Posted 14 August 2012 - 09:18 PM
At current, both parties fans are equally annoying, so if i were in the US, i would just not vote.
It's no wonder the US is a mess... people just don't care anymore.
It's really me, now. #backtoAE
#24
Posted 14 August 2012 - 10:07 PM
Cough cough... Approval voting... cough cough.
There goes CRAZY uncle Ron, BABBLING about the unsustainablity of multiple WARS. -Jon Stewart
#25
Posted 15 August 2012 - 02:08 AM
First off, provide evidence that Obama has done something to 'ruin' the country. Fact is that there is nothing. He may have done things that your political party hasn't agreed with, however, he's done nothing that has pushed the country into a bad state, at worst he's possibly stalled growth in certain sectors.And let the country go to hell while the incumbent ruins it? No thankss.
The problem of the US right is that they pretend that Liberals cause all of the issue. While the Left (economically) is a bit of a basket case... The Right (socially) causes the same issues. Take Bush for instance... He's created the largest fiscally irresponsible situation the US has more than likely ever been in. The Iraq war was an unjustifiable expense on the US economy and by far worst than anything Obama has considered. We've spent over 3 Trillion on praying on American fears which benefited mostly those in the oil and arms industry (primarily the right).
This war has lead to one of the largest economical depression and recessions in our history. For one, the war caused the largest in oil prices in the country. This in effect dramatically reduces spending on tourism, and extra fun things. Now, from my limited understanding, Bush did offer some tax breaks to the population which helped offset some of this.
As Bush's term went on we went into MASSIVE debt over a war that had NOTHING to do with us. We also got one of the most illegal laws in history which virtually raped the US constitution as a result of his fun war.
So here we are, Obama is not getting elected and BAM auto-industry is dieing off. The Right start screaming 'NO BAILOUT' and the Left is all 'I heart GMC'. So Obama give them a LOAN. For some strange reason our uneducated population seems to have missed this. The companies that recieved this loan have of course paid it back WITH interest... yet the right still says we're billions in the hole thanks to Obama.
But once again... We've not come to the main cause of the recession which was sub-prime s***. My understanding this has to do with Clinton (back when I was still young). Clinton ok's selling lead and calling it gold. This combined with Bush's war for the lawls pushed us into the biggest ****ing mess in our history. So the left tries to add regulations to the Banking industry which gets blocked at every possible avenue from the right... Is it a coincidence that the same companies who caused this sub-prime s*** (among other financial **** ups with corruption) are the biggest funders of Romney-Ryan? I doubt it.
So... Before you say Obama is bad... Remember that the right is the one who put is 3trillion (if not 4 by this point) in debt.
I understand that you're still a child, but don't try to be politically ignorant yet. You're too young to act so foolish.
I have no problems with economical right, but if you move too far right you're going to **** up the country just like when you move too far left.
Nice Read:
http://www.washingto...0090302200.html
#26
Posted 15 August 2012 - 02:53 AM
Fans shouldn't really be put into two groups with the parties, for instance fans of Ron Paul and fans of Mitt Romney will be 2 very different groups.At current, both parties fans are equally annoying, so if i were in the US, i would just not vote.
there are really a lot of different sets within the parties.
some groups
- Libertarian Republicans
- Wall Street Republicans
- Tea Party Republicans
- Neoconservative Republicans
- Disaffected Independents
- Post-Modern Independents
- Moderate Independents
- Coalition Democrats
- Traditional Democrats
- Socialistic Democrats
- Collectivist Anarchist
- Social Anarchist
#27
Posted 20 August 2012 - 12:38 PM
The reason third party canidates fail is that people know they will not win and choose to vote for the most similar major party.
If everyone who was a Libertarian voted for the Libertarian Party and not the GOP it would be main-stream, same with Greens and Democrats.
If everyone who was a Libertarian voted for the Libertarian Party and not the GOP it would be main-stream, same with Greens and Democrats.
#28
Posted 02 September 2012 - 09:20 PM
*i can vote*
Edit:wow, just unjarbled that message lol
Edit:wow, just unjarbled that message lol
#29
Posted 03 September 2012 - 12:26 AM
If you can vote at this moment isn't terribly relevant, because the teens today will be voting for the President in 2016 and beyond.
There goes CRAZY uncle Ron, BABBLING about the unsustainablity of multiple WARS. -Jon Stewart
#30
Posted 09 September 2012 - 04:24 AM
I thought that I might just leave this here...
#31
Posted 09 September 2012 - 04:25 AM
Steve
#32
Posted 09 September 2012 - 04:33 AM
Neither is That Rosswhat a non contributing post.
I love it tho steve.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users