On-time performance unrealistic?
#1
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:40 AM
For example, my A333 in R6 operates SIN-HND-SIN daily, leaving 26 hours weekly, which is around 3.7hr daily.
This means that the aircraft actually has 4.8hr downtime as the game only allows around 22.9hr utilisation daily.
In addition, the unutilised hours already excludes the turnaround time for the aircraft, which is 1.25hr each leg, 2.5hrs daily for my A333.
This means that the aircraft has a total time of 7.3hr daily (3.75hr each leg) for turnaround. This is a long time in real life, but the OTP rating for the SIN-HND-SIN route is still in the yellow range. Are the standards for OTP ratings too high?
By the way, my employee morale is 96%, so I don't think that affects the OTP much.
#2
Posted 07 December 2012 - 01:09 AM
#3
Posted 07 December 2012 - 06:46 AM
#4
Posted 08 January 2013 - 08:38 PM
BTW: I made a flight schedule (this was going to implied in AE4, right?) and this airplane flies the according to the following schedule:
ANC-YWG: 12:28-19:41 (local times)
YWG-ANC: 8:12-9:25 (local times)
#5
Posted 10 January 2013 - 01:18 AM
The on-time performance works totally unrealistically for me, it just comes up with whatever it fancies, sometimes brilliant other times horrifically delayed
#6
Posted 10 January 2013 - 01:28 AM
#7
Posted 10 January 2013 - 01:32 AM
I seen it give me decent rating for maxed out planes along with only decent with 70-80 hours left
My point exactly, I can get full rating with Kaibaby's maxed out 733's and nothing with barely-used CS300's with Kai London
#8
Posted 10 January 2013 - 03:57 AM
#9
Posted 10 January 2013 - 10:03 PM
#10
Posted 13 January 2013 - 02:24 PM
#11
Posted 13 January 2013 - 02:43 PM
Yeah.
#12
Posted 13 January 2013 - 02:46 PM
#13
Posted 01 February 2013 - 11:36 PM
so yeah back on topic, say on a JFK-BOS route, you want to operate daily, if you operate 1x daily flight on just 1 aircraft, your OTP rating will be worse than using 7 different aircraft flying 1x weeklies. basically if you wanna get a good OTP rating use a heap of different aircraft.
#14
Posted 02 February 2013 - 08:01 AM
#15
Posted 01 March 2013 - 08:56 PM
And if you have only very few slots left at a airport, your ontime performance decreases too.
Never new that one, it's good to know
#16
Posted 03 March 2013 - 08:22 PM
Hmm. I suspect long haul flights are more likely to be slightly delayed.
But a drop in performance just because it's a long flight seems a bit odd...
Administrator of UnitedSkies alliance
and also a member of some other ones, but they're 2vip4u
#17
Posted 09 March 2013 - 01:49 AM
In real life is in reverse.
Shorts flights are more likely to get delayed because 1 ac will make + - 7 legs.
And in longhaul, ac fly one or two legs a day.
In SH, if the first leg goes tech, by 35 min, the rest of flights flown by that ac will most likely get delayed.
But in LH, it isnt like that
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users