Sign In
Create Account
This is for my own airline, FyreFly. This is also the first livery utilising my new template. These templates are shaded, modified, and enhanced by me.
E7 - Airline Livery & Logo Design
Started by lvan, Apr 10 2012 01:14 AM
-
This topic is locked
#1
Posted 10 April 2012 - 01:14 AM
lvan
-
- Member
-
- 864 posts
AE Addict
Hello, this is the topic where I post all of my airline logos, liveries, and other graphics that I do.
This is for my own airline, FyreFly. This is also the first livery utilising my new template. These templates are shaded, modified, and enhanced by me.
This is for my own airline, FyreFly. This is also the first livery utilising my new template. These templates are shaded, modified, and enhanced by me.
Back to top
#4
Posted 11 April 2012 - 11:24 PM
You asked for a comment.
You're work is awful. To improve it, remove all colour from the image so you have a white canvas.
You didn't say it had to be serious.
You're work is awful. To improve it, remove all colour from the image so you have a white canvas.
You didn't say it had to be serious.
#5
Posted 11 April 2012 - 11:56 PM
Kirkland
-
- Member
-
- 1,504 posts
AE King
#7
Posted 15 April 2012 - 09:23 PM
porter
-
- AE Moderator
-
- 65 posts
AE Graphic Designer
- Yahoo ID:porter66062
That Air Canada seems a bit too blue... otherwise, not terrible.
#9
Posted 16 April 2012 - 08:46 AM
I don't know if this is supposed to be an exact replica of the real thing. My comments below are assuming that it is supposed to replicate the real thing.
Okay so the shade of red on the Qantas should be a brighter shade, the legs of the kangaroo should be "reaching out" towards the rear door more. Also there should be a small gap between the kangaroo's legs and the horizontal stabiliser. Finally the word "QANTAS" should start in the space between Door 1 and the first cabin window. Consequently all the words have to be brought forward
i feel like a f*g now for saying all of that 
Okay so the shade of red on the Qantas should be a brighter shade, the legs of the kangaroo should be "reaching out" towards the rear door more. Also there should be a small gap between the kangaroo's legs and the horizontal stabiliser. Finally the word "QANTAS" should start in the space between Door 1 and the first cabin window. Consequently all the words have to be brought forward
i feel like a f*g now for saying all of that
#11
Posted 16 April 2012 - 02:57 PM
PacificAirways
-
- Member
-
- 316 posts
Busy Bee
Nice work!!! Fusalage could be more white but overall, good job 
P.S. make me one
P.S. make me one
Pacific Airways - Head of Public Relations, Globe Alliance
#14
Posted 16 April 2012 - 03:13 PM
lvan
-
- Member
-
- 864 posts
AE Addict
Yes, NSW is un1's airline. He was going to design a real website for it, so he just said to put down .tk.
#15
Posted 20 April 2012 - 02:07 AM
4Engines
-
- Member
-
- 235 posts
Australian Livery King
Good work ev! I agree with AR re: the QF A330. The new livery was specifically designed so that the legs of the kangaroo weren't broken by the horizontal stabiliser, ie...
#17
Posted 20 April 2012 - 03:42 PM
The TACA livery is
Is that a joke?No offence, Everett, but frankly it looks s***. The logo itself looks a right mess; straight lines are clearly visible where there should be curves, not to mention the actual shape of it looks terribly odd. Certainly I can't work out what it's meant to be; if anything, it looks like a series of random shapes drawn in MS Paint plonked together in a random, disorganized manner. That typeface does not work with the logo; comparative to the logo, it's too complex, and hence doesn't look natural.
Then the livery, which to me looks as though you simply couldn't think of anything. The random blue section looks terribly out of place in relation to the tail logo, the size and positioning of which are certainly questionable too.
To sum it up, I'd say it's a disorganized piece of work, created upon aims that were either non-existent prior to design process beginning, or were simply forgotten about.
#18
Posted 20 April 2012 - 05:26 PM
violetQueen
-
- Member
-
- 584 posts
The Resident B!tch
No offence, Everett, but frankly it looks s***. The logo itself looks a right mess; straight lines are clearly visible where there should be curves, not to mention the actual shape of it looks terribly odd. Certainly I can't work out what it's meant to be; if anything, it looks like a series of random shapes drawn in MS Paint plonked together in a random, disorganized manner. That typeface does not work with the logo; comparative to the logo, it's too complex, and hence doesn't look natural.
Then the livery, which to me looks as though you simply couldn't think of anything. The random blue section looks terribly out of place in relation to the tail logo, the size and positioning of which are certainly questionable too.
To sum it up, I'd say it's a disorganized piece of work, created upon aims that were either non-existent prior to design process beginning, or were simply forgotten about.
I liked TW and it's gone. NW, and it's gone. CO, and it's gone. Pray I don't like you.
"How sad it would be, should laughter disappear."
Spoiler
#19
Posted 20 April 2012 - 07:40 PM
Yeah that TACA livery just has a bit much going on. I do like the colors though
#20
Posted 20 April 2012 - 08:18 PM
Is this wind up SB day?
Everett's design's a pile of s***. If you're trying to suggest it follows TACA's trend of crap liveries, I'd agree with you there. That said, their current logo and paint scheme is one of the best in the industry.
How the logo resembles TACA's logos of the past I don't see, other than the fact it's a bird (I think, I can't quite work out what Everett's is supposed to be?), which as we all know isn't exactly a unique concept in this industry...
Frankly you hit the nail on the head in saying 'Execution and design is flawed'. It looks as though it was thrown together in five minutes. I highly doubt much consideration was made in terms of sticking with historical designs of TACA.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
