am i the only one who choose passenger preferences ? I think it would be better of you could have service levels and so . The aircraft selection is very good ! :cool: Till new airports come , i think more gates at the airports are helpful .
#21
Posted 27 June 2005 - 03:26 PM
#22
Posted 27 June 2005 - 03:47 PM
I suggested passenger perf. but I still think cheating police is more important.
#23
Posted 27 June 2005 - 04:14 PM
Miller has said he will try and add all the cities with more than 100k pax per year. However, there has been no timeframe on this.
#24
Posted 29 June 2005 - 11:08 AM
just wondering , how many airports in this world have over 100k pax a year? isn't this a very huge number of airports , or am i getting something wrong here ?
#25
Posted 29 June 2005 - 11:37 AM
Well, there should be at least 1000-2000 airports with over 100k pax a year, i would assume.
#26
Posted 29 June 2005 - 03:14 PM
Originally posted by Maestro69
Well, there should be at least 1000-2000 airports with over 100k pax a year, i would assume.
Plus we have one under that limit (SBN)
#27
Posted 29 June 2005 - 03:32 PM
I just want to see MHT.
#28
Guest_Nathaniel_*
Posted 29 June 2005 - 04:02 PM
SBN pax info: 802191
a little more than what you said it was under.....
a little more than what you said it was under.....
#29
Posted 29 June 2005 - 07:31 PM
SBN is that big:o
I've only seen props at that airport when I lived there
I've only seen props at that airport when I lived there
#30
Posted 29 June 2005 - 07:53 PM
#31
Posted 16 July 2005 - 02:24 PM
I would definately say that there should be more planes some new cheap ones and new expensive ones because that gives people more options.
.
.
#32
Posted 16 July 2005 - 03:20 PM
that ones been mentioned plenty of times. once the aircraft broker feature is added, all the planes will be available
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users