Jump to content

Issue Information

  • #002554

  • Issue

Issue Confirmations

  • Yes (2)No (0)
Photo

DC-8 launch dates and range

Posted by Amtran on 05 September 2015 - 06:31 PM

I was doing some reading into the DC-8 recently, and I noticed some discrepancies between some of the Super 60s launch dates. The -61 is currently listed as launching in 1962 in the database, but the program wasn't announced until 1965. According to the airliners.net page on the DC-8-60 series, and the Flight International archives, the -61 and -62 started delivery in 1967, followed by the -63 in 1968.
 
As far as their range goes, I also looked at Boeing's Airport Compatibility documents on the DC-8, and in the performance charts, it seems that according to the manufacturer (or at least the manufacturer's successor), the ranges at MTOW differ somewhat from what AE has now (Notes: The charts require some interpolation, and the -50 as shown in the charts is the -55, the model with the highest MTOW).

 

In summary: the -50 has too much range, and the -60s series aircraft have too little range, with the -62 actually having more range than the -50.
 
A comparison:
-50: AE: 5653 nm / Actual MTOW range: ~3900 nm / 189 pax and baggage: ~4600 nm / a.net: 4970 nm
-61: AE: 2763 nm / Actual MTOW range: ~2500 nm / 259 pax and baggage: ~3200 nm / a.net: 3256 nm
-62: AE: 3754 nm / Actual MTOW range: ~4500 nm / 189 pax and baggage: ~5200 nm / a.net: 5210 nm
-63: AE: 3647 nm / Actual MTOW range: ~3300 nm / 259 pax and baggage: ~4000 nm / a.net: 3907 nm
 
Sources:
DC-8-50 airliners.net page
DC-8-60 Series airliner.net page
DC-8 Boeing ACAPS PDF, Aircraft Performance section starts on page 45


Just to point out Amtran, AE uses statute miles not nautical miles so in the case of the -61 series it's relatively close to what it actually is. Also the max payload range in AE is apparently extrapolated from the max range rather than something that can be manually adjusted.

 



i have taken a look on the sources you provided compared with the AE Data as well as other sources i have and i can confirm that current data is wrong and will be updated during the next few days.

 

however as Frdm pointed out AE use Statute Miles and not NM.

 

Thanks for letting us know :)



Just a quick update, it seems the range is updated as of the R1 launch, but the dates weren't adjusted before R1 went up (-61/-62 first service in 1967, -63 in 1968).



The dates where never modifyed, thats why the status of this issue is still "Beeing Fixed"

 

they will eventually be fixed but are not the top priority at the moment.







0 user(s) are reading this issue

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users