Jump to content

Photo

Why no one using the 757-300


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1
Tanthien

Tanthien

    AE Addict To-Be

  • Member
  • 10 posts
Considering it's way cheaper than a 757-200, and carrying more pax than an A321 while consuming not much more fuel and only takes 20 mins more to turn. I am suprised that no one order the thing and the used market for it is almost non existant

#2
RubberDuckGaming

RubberDuckGaming

    Duck

  • Member
  • 397 posts
  • Website:https://bit.do/ducktube

User's Awards

      2      

It releases much later than the 752 and is only available for a short time, so it’s just harder to acquire.


6DAF18E9-01AB-4C75-BA89-CF609AFA4A8D.jpeg
 
 
 
 
 

 


#3
Bonza

Bonza

    Supersonic lover

  • Member
  • 28 posts

don't forget it's only really useful for a small number of routes


Australian 

Favourite Planes:Concorde,747,A318,L-1011,L-1049

Thinks he can find MH370 just through reading books

Favourite Airline:Qantas


#4
Jeb

Jeb

    sänk you for travelling with se deutsche bahn (More than 180 Mi

  • Member
  • 74 posts

User's Awards

4    2    9    5   

For the same reasons why it wasn´t very sucessfull in real life because it´s quite a niche aircraft designed for european charter routes while in most cases it´s better to keep the Boeing 767-200 around until the 787 arrives due to deprecation and flexibility which the 753 lacks.



#5
kellykeli

kellykeli

    trumpet go doot

  • Member
  • 99 posts

User's Awards

2    2       2      

Because the A310-300 exists. It's a 757-300ER.


B757-200 best plane you can't change my mind


#6
Jeb

Jeb

    sänk you for travelling with se deutsche bahn (More than 180 Mi

  • Member
  • 74 posts

User's Awards

4    2    9    5   

Because the A310-300 exists. It's a 757-300ER.

Little Problem, if you are expanding you won´t be that dumb to order the the A310-meh, but rather order it´s bigger, more beautiful and more fuel efficient per seat brother the A300-600R, although the 753 may have 1000 miles less range but it is 20% (without WL) more fuel efficient than a A310 plus this 1000 miles gap can be plugged any time with the Kitchen Gun of widebodies, the 767-300ER.

And when we speak of the 757 than I highly recommend to order the -200M instead of the -200 because deliveries happens every 2 weeks instead of three which in the game year of 40 weeks means 20 757-200M against 13 1/3 757-200 and tbh range is just overestimated, it´s efficiency that is all above else.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users