Jump to content

Photo

Hall of fame

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#21
WingsOTWorld

WingsOTWorld

    MEMBER 4EVA!

  • Member
  • 822 posts
Way too few...make it top 100....if we do it period.
Posted Image
Posted ImagePosted Image

Aircraft Owned: ATR-72s, Saabs, EMB-195LRs, A319s, 1 Q400, and A330s
ANA-The Pinnacle of Japanese Aviation (Kickin off at ORD) -An ACE Alliance Member / エイス アラヤンス メンバー全日空
ID#:10917

#22
drv4truk

drv4truk

    AE Winner

  • Veteran
  • 2,273 posts

Way too few...make it top 100....if we do it period.


Then don't do it at all. It's a hall of fame, not a list of all users.
Posted ImagePosted Image

#23
WingsOTWorld

WingsOTWorld

    MEMBER 4EVA!

  • Member
  • 822 posts
A list of all users is into the 200s/300s or like i said....just put all the active members on this forum into a hall of fame :P
Posted Image
Posted ImagePosted Image

Aircraft Owned: ATR-72s, Saabs, EMB-195LRs, A319s, 1 Q400, and A330s
ANA-The Pinnacle of Japanese Aviation (Kickin off at ORD) -An ACE Alliance Member / エイス アラヤンス メンバー全日空
ID#:10917

#24
oubobcat

oubobcat

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 236 posts
  • AIM Screen Name:parsonparsons
id say induct 5 per round. that might be a good way of doing it. think football here :sdrool: i think that if we put 5 in per round starting this round we should be good. maybe even starting by inducting 10 this round. we could somehow come up with a way of voting the airlines in and then have that to look at for later reference. if we dont feel 5 should be inducted that particular game we dont have to do 5. the idea of a hof is a great one it just needs to be ironed into something that is actually worthwhile. inducting 100 airlines gives it no purpose. we should be able to add on later and by doing that we would never be able to add in any other airlines. i say start with ten, then induct 5 per round. hows that?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users