23 replies to this topic

[The Cat-alyst]

49,000 feet. Very realistic

 

And choosing larger aircraft gives an advantage to certain airlines because they make more money.

 

Think about it. An A321 obviously makes more money than a 737

 

i meant 39,000 feet, i forgot to fix that typo.

so what about this flightplan chooser, do you think it'd work or not?

 

to me, I thin kit could work because you then have more control of when the flights happen so yuo can pick the days of the week that are most likely to have the most customers and you can pick your ideal altitude and speed.

49,000 feet was a typo, and i was an idiiot for not editing it earlier.

[The Cat-alyst]

there's nothing wrong with flynig an a319 on that route, but it's not ideal. likewise I ask what is wrong with flying a 767-200 from Winipeg to PUnta Cana or Toronto to Vegas?

[DeltaA350]

Many leisure airlines have smaller aircraft.

 

Thomson - 737-800

 

TUIfly - 737-700 and 737-800

 

Air Canada Rouge - A319-100

 

Air Transat - 737-800

 

SunExpress - 737-800

[The Cat-alyst]

bump