Unacceptable Airline names
#1
Posted 05 December 2005 - 04:54 PM
George W Bush Air - **** the French! - #877
#2
Posted 05 December 2005 - 04:55 PM
Originally posted by drv4truk
Ok, this is ridiculous.
George W Bush Air - <b>f*ck</b> the French! - #877
TorqueWrench has been U2U yesterday on this and said he will look into it.
#3
Posted 05 December 2005 - 09:18 PM
#4
Posted 05 December 2005 - 10:42 PM
#5
Posted 05 December 2005 - 11:00 PM
Originally posted by jackthestrip
You cant seriously restrict what name a new airline can have.....
watch them
#6
Posted 05 December 2005 - 11:57 PM
#7
Posted 06 December 2005 - 12:00 AM
#8
Posted 06 December 2005 - 05:53 PM
Originally posted by drv4truk
Ok, this is ridiculous.
George W Bush Air - <b>f*ck</b> the French! - #877
Add this 4 letter word one to the list:
http://www.airlineem...php?player=9176
#9
Posted 06 December 2005 - 06:04 PM
I would like to thank the idiots that are opening multiple airlines just to get gates where they need them. I was able to pick up some of my needed gates that way. There are a number of airports that had 0 gates for a long time that now mysteriously have 5 gates available.
#10
Posted 06 December 2005 - 06:14 PM
Originally posted by drv4truk
Yeah, I sent a message to Torque. They appear to be purely spoilers.
I would like to thank the idiots that are opening multiple airlines just to get gates where they need them. I was able to pick up some of my needed gates that way. There are a number of airports that had 0 gates for a long time that now mysteriously have 5 gates available.
In away, the points you described it is another reason the player numbers should be caped. But its not so, and we must grin and accept it.
#11
Posted 06 December 2005 - 07:59 PM
#12
Posted 06 December 2005 - 10:04 PM
Originally posted by travelhouse
Originally posted by drv4truk
Yeah, I sent a message to Torque. They appear to be purely spoilers.
I would like to thank the idiots that are opening multiple airlines just to get gates where they need them. I was able to pick up some of my needed gates that way. There are a number of airports that had 0 gates for a long time that now mysteriously have 5 gates available.
In away, the points you described it is another reason the player numbers should be caped. But its not so, and we must grin and accept it.
Or you make sure that airlines can not start out at a City that has no gates available. This stops more gates being made and reduces the chances of new spoilers. Yes before I get shot down in flames im aware that this has been suggested before. Simple solution to this problem in my opinion.
#13
Posted 06 December 2005 - 10:12 PM
#14
Posted 06 December 2005 - 10:15 PM
I wonder why new airlines (Ryanair, Easyjet) in the real world don't start in an excellent location like Heathrow and start in crap places like...Luton/Stansted?...oh wait, Heathrow is slot restricted!Originally posted by dazwalsh
yeah but they will be all starting out somewhere crap like the canary islands
We're going way off topic, and I sure want a ride but not on a c*** tyvm.
[Edited on 12/6/2005 by Pacific]
#15
Posted 06 December 2005 - 10:38 PM
I suggest that next time they reset it, they do it for a long painful time and get something done about it!
#16
Posted 06 December 2005 - 10:40 PM
#17
Posted 06 December 2005 - 10:40 PM
If they start somewhere crap, so be it........ let them scrap it out for gates like everyone else does.... not just handed to them on a plate.
#18
Posted 09 December 2005 - 05:43 AM
#19
Posted 09 December 2005 - 02:29 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users