Jump to content

Photo

[APPROVED] Boeing 727 Winglets


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1
����Justin����

����Justin����

    AE Know It All

  • Member
  • 176 posts

I've seen lots of 727 around that are fitted with winglets. Could we add that to the game?

0181048.jpg

0186125.jpg

0182110.jpg


4075019335.pngGoogle Inbox invites available! PM for more info.


#2
mxax-ai

mxax-ai

    OMGZ I LUUUUV AE!!!

  • Member
  • 585 posts

User's Awards

3    3      

A 727 with winglets looks worse than a 787 without raked wingtips.

Where did you see that. :P



#3
Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clinton

    Hillary Rodham Clinton

  • Member
  • 216 posts

User's Awards

2   

787-3


cc_orig.jpg


#4
Will101

Will101

    Only Teardrops

  • Member
  • 1,683 posts

So it appears you've seen so many you forgot yourself and posted the same airframe twice ;)



#5
Northern

Northern

    Data Collector

  • Data Collector
  • 1,623 posts

User's Awards

2    2    4   

Winglets have now been made available after 1999.


banner_signature_northern.png


#6
craps

craps

    New Member

  • Member
  • 1 posts

I :D Boeing 727-200 with WINGLET.

 

 



#7
KJS607

KJS607

    The O.G. Savage

  • Member
  • 3,860 posts
  • Website:https://www.thetravelsavage.com/

User's Awards

6       3   

Amerijet only need one engine. Saves costs.


msg-1341-0-50048700-1680446869_thumb.png

 

I did a thing: thetravelsavage.com

 


#8
Randallator

Randallator

    Train Fan

  • Member
  • 337 posts

User's Awards

      2   

Amerijet only need one engine. Saves costs.

it wouldn't as that 1 engine would need to apply more power to get the same thrust if possible


2rLn142.pngmsg-26818-0-86969200-1392319731.png

 
#aerlingus&ryanairworldbestairline


#9
mxax-ai

mxax-ai

    OMGZ I LUUUUV AE!!!

  • Member
  • 585 posts

User's Awards

3    3      

it wouldn't as that 1 engine would need to apply more power to get the same thrust if possible


But has less maintenance parts. :P




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users