Sign In
Create Account
1
- Owner: AirGEL (View all images and albums)
- Uploaded: Apr 15 2020 11:14 PM
- Views: 1,402
- Album Realism
MSN - 1577
A/C Type - ATR 72-600
First Flight - 14 Jun 2019
Age - 0.8 Years
Test Reg - F-WWEK
Status - Stored
Operating History
Reg - 9M-LGC
Operator - Malindo Air
Delivery Date - 3 Jul 2019
Reg - 9M-LGC
Operator - Royal Brunei Airlines
Delivery Date - 27 Jul 2019
Engines - 2x PWC PW127M
Additional Info: Leased from Malindo Air
bro this is just plain lazy and you should feel bad
yes nice i see so much effort
bro this is just plain lazy and you should feel bad
Do you guys not realize this is a recreation of a real livery? Zipp, you were literally on the other end of such a misunderstanding a few days ago, where your TAA recreation got the s*** criticized out of it by someone who thought it was an original design...
This kind of thing - recreations of the simplest liveries - requires a lot of attention to detail to make it look right, so I've got a few comments. The registration font isn't quite right (maybe try playing around with the 'uk number plate' font or whatever it's called, that one tends to work quite well for this kind of reg. Also, the 'ATR 72' font isn't the right one - there's a specific one that ATR uses. Finally, and I'm not 100% sure about this one, but I think the Malaysian flag at the front of the fuselage is a tad too large.
Do you guys not realize this is a recreation of a real livery? Zipp, you were literally on the other end of such a misunderstanding a few days ago, where your TAA recreation got the s*** criticized out of it by someone who thought it was an original design...
This kind of thing - recreations of the simplest liveries - requires a lot of attention to detail to make it look right, so I've got a few comments. The registration font isn't quite right (maybe try playing around with the 'uk number plate' font or whatever it's called, that one tends to work quite well for this kind of reg. Also, the 'ATR 72' font isn't the right one - there's a specific one that ATR uses. Finally, and I'm not 100% sure about this one, but I think the Malaysian flag at the front of the fuselage is a tad too large.
dont make me call tony abbott to shirtfront you
Do you guys not realize this is a recreation of a real livery? Zipp, you were literally on the other end of such a misunderstanding a few days ago, where your TAA recreation got the s*** criticized out of it by someone who thought it was an original design...
This kind of thing - recreations of the simplest liveries - requires a lot of attention to detail to make it look right, so I've got a few comments. The registration font isn't quite right (maybe try playing around with the 'uk number plate' font or whatever it's called, that one tends to work quite well for this kind of reg. Also, the 'ATR 72' font isn't the right one - there's a specific one that ATR uses. Finally, and I'm not 100% sure about this one, but I think the Malaysian flag at the front of the fuselage is a tad too large.
tl:dr
Do you guys not realize this is a recreation of a real livery? Zipp, you were literally on the other end of such a misunderstanding a few days ago, where your TAA recreation got the s*** criticized out of it by someone who thought it was an original design...
This kind of thing - recreations of the simplest liveries - requires a lot of attention to detail to make it look right, so I've got a few comments. The registration font isn't quite right (maybe try playing around with the 'uk number plate' font or whatever it's called, that one tends to work quite well for this kind of reg. Also, the 'ATR 72' font isn't the right one - there's a specific one that ATR uses. Finally, and I'm not 100% sure about this one, but I think the Malaysian flag at the front of the fuselage is a tad too large.
next time make sure u put this in MLA format
next time make sure u put this in MLA format
Do you guys not realize this is a recreation of a real livery? Zipp, you were literally on the other end of such a misunderstanding a few days ago, where your TAA recreation got the s*** criticized out of it by someone who thought it was an original design...
This kind of thing - recreations of the simplest liveries - requires a lot of attention to detail to make it look right, so I've got a few comments. The registration font isn't quite right (maybe try playing around with the 'uk number plate' font or whatever it's called, that one tends to work quite well for this kind of reg. Also, the 'ATR 72' font isn't the right one - there's a specific one that ATR uses. Finally, and I'm not 100% sure about this one, but I think the Malaysian flag at the front of the fuselage is a tad too large.
You forgot to indent -5 points
We disregard everything you say unless you cite your sources. Plagiarism is not a joke.Do you guys not realize this is a recreation of a real livery? Zipp, you were literally on the other end of such a misunderstanding a few days ago, where your TAA recreation got the s*** criticized out of it by someone who thought it was an original design...
This kind of thing - recreations of the simplest liveries - requires a lot of attention to detail to make it look right, so I've got a few comments. The registration font isn't quite right (maybe try playing around with the 'uk number plate' font or whatever it's called, that one tends to work quite well for this kind of reg. Also, the 'ATR 72' font isn't the right one - there's a specific one that ATR uses. Finally, and I'm not 100% sure about this one, but I think the Malaysian flag at the front of the fuselage is a tad too large.
If this comment war continues, I will lock the comments
yes nice i see so much effort