I Had to Smile
#1
Posted 14 December 2008 - 12:57 PM
#2
Posted 14 December 2008 - 04:40 PM
#3
Posted 15 December 2008 - 02:43 AM
landing at DCA? maybe it has the enhanced take-off/landing performance added to the plane just like all of GOL's 738s that will allow them to t/o and land at santos dumont in brazil at full capacity.
Landing isn't a problem, its taking off. When landing an aircraft should be below max landing weight because of the fuel burned off during the flight. Exceptions are emergency landings where they have to dump fuel in order not to stress the airframe on landing.
Taking off is another issue... sure regular 738's, 752's, and 767's can take off from DCA... they don't need a lot of fuel to fly to ATL or JFK from there... They're not going to Europe from DCA, right?
#4
Posted 15 December 2008 - 05:18 AM
Landing isn't a problem, its taking off. When landing an aircraft should be below max landing weight because of the fuel burnt off during the flight. Exceptions are emergency landings where they have to dump fuel in order not to stress the airframe on landing.
Taking off is another issue... sure regular 738's, 752's, and 767's can take off from DCA... they don't need a lot of fuel to fly to ATL or JFK from there... They're not going to Europe from DCA, right?
Oh, owned, hehe, yeah and DCA has a no international flight rule, expect for Carribean and i guess canada so it was probably a short hop,
#5
Posted 15 December 2008 - 02:43 PM
#6
Posted 15 December 2008 - 02:54 PM
#7
Posted 16 December 2008 - 07:20 AM
767's come in to DCA all the time...yes there are no flights to europe but there are flights to the west coast..LAS PHX SEA LAX so planes do take off from there with big load of fuel
I had to look this up, but actually the 767-200 could take off from DCA at MTOW... the 767-300 has a range about double that of the distance from DCA to the west coast but doesn't need much more of a runway even at MTOW so no prob making it to the west coast from there on the needed fuel load for that trip. The 737-800, surprisingly, actually takes a fair amount of runway at MTOW... more than any of the 767's except the -400.
#8
Posted 16 December 2008 - 10:04 AM
#9
Posted 16 December 2008 - 12:45 PM
btw, does everyone know that there is a good, unobstructed view of newark's main runway? unfortunately you have to be on the nj turnpike! lol
#10
Guest_M4matthew_*
Posted 30 December 2008 - 03:45 PM
Sim 1 player
GBAirlines
#11
Posted 31 December 2008 - 04:42 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users