Top ten rankings from the last round
#1
Posted 18 March 2007 - 03:08 PM
#2
Posted 18 March 2007 - 05:51 PM
#3
Posted 18 March 2007 - 07:20 PM
#4
Posted 19 March 2007 - 02:05 AM
#5
Posted 25 May 2007 - 10:09 AM
(Limbo's MIA, KLM's having "fun", Australis is packing boxes, and I'm a lazy bum!)
#6
Posted 26 May 2007 - 10:45 AM
KLM's having "fun"
By activating the bug on ZRH-JFK with 3 333s...
It became obvious that you were just messing around not too long ago when B1900s started appearing on a lot of my routes. OK, that's fine. Maybe the game gets old and you want to challenge yourself to succeed, that's cool. But then the first ten pages of used planes are your J31 and Beeches, and I start to wonder what's up. Now this. Man, I have no doubt you put a lot of time and effort into playing the game in the past. So now that it's boring to you, why are you trying to ruin it for everyone else?
#7
Posted 26 May 2007 - 11:12 AM
Interesting how the tide has turned - seems to be an ACE round this round!
(Limbo's MIA, KLM's having "fun", Australis is packing boxes, and I'm a lazy bum!)
I would also say there was being certain 'circumstances' beyond anyone's controls that has lead to the makeup of the current top 10. Obviously, i dont want to make excuses for nothing, but just a note on your theory Pacific.
Whoever is first, won it on merit of his or her actions.
And on the KaaiElEm accusation, eh.. no.. he put 3 A330-300s perhaps because your resetting that route 24/7 and he may just a bit ticked about that?.. Dont know why people just think bad thoughts all the time, obviously they dont think their actions may lead to further consequences... just a point of thought
#8
Posted 26 May 2007 - 11:17 AM
because your resetting that route 24/7 and he may just a bit ticked about that?..
that player is not the only one right!!!!!!! mr pluto is also a pain i gave him the spanish mainland and still the jerk will not lower prices for the few little remaining routes i have there
oh well if some want to lay around on ae 24/7 i guess miller has a few followers
#9
Posted 26 May 2007 - 12:06 PM
By activating the bug on ZRH-JFK with 3 333s...
It became obvious that you were just messing around not too long ago when B1900s started appearing on a lot of my routes. OK, that's fine. Maybe the game gets old and you want to challenge yourself to succeed, that's cool. But then the first ten pages of used planes are your J31 and Beeches, and I start to wonder what's up. Now this. Man, I have no doubt you put a lot of time and effort into playing the game in the past. So now that it's boring to you, why are you trying to ruin it for everyone else?
hmmm, info has been removed
#10
Posted 27 May 2007 - 01:32 AM
Even more juvenile is your toying with words, to suggest I'm claiming any routes are mine. Obviously I meant routes which I fly. Grow up.
By the way, I don't know enough about the way the game works, but given its flaws, I would much rather exchange messages with other people on routes I fly to achieve fares that perhaps pay out less but don't zero someone else out. I don't know if it's possible. I think the flaws in the game drive everyone to be spiteful and eventually, ruinous. I'm totally tempted to start doing something ridiculous myself, but what good could come of it? I certainly wouldn't derive any joy from wrecking the game for say, Fly By Night, so I won't.
#11
Posted 27 May 2007 - 03:13 AM
Dont know why people just think bad thoughts all the time, obviously they dont think their actions may lead to further consequences... just a point of thought
I don't think he is cheating, just didn't understand why he bugged the route; I saw that he was having "fun" as has been noted, and it was fine, until the route bugging. I believe the better players do exactly what you claim bothers you guys - monitoring routes a lot and fixing them, and that they do not cheat. That's what makes all the cheating claims so stupid. They're sore over better players. To me, seeing Australis' 747D on a route is a sign that he's a good player. Seeing a player with 4 aircraft of different types on a route, thereby bugging it (this is another player who plays almost randomly but has a decent size fleet, it doesn't matter who) suggests a not good player. Especially since the frequencies don't suggest gate holding.
And you're right, when I returned today, tons of my routes were zeroed by KLM. If playing the game becomes all about screwing over people who call you out for doing something (even if it's accidental, but come on, 3 333s?) then perhaps you need another hobby. I've been planning to take next round off, do some more productive/fun things with my life, I'm really hoping the game is something I actually find myself missing. But the current incarnation probably won't make that happen.
#12
Posted 27 May 2007 - 05:05 AM
Seeing a player with 4 aircraft of different types on a route, thereby bugging it (this is another player who plays almost randomly but has a decent size fleet, it doesn't matter who) suggests a not good player. Especially since the frequencies don't suggest gate holding.
i do agree
this more than one type or plane and at times 2 or more and a ticket price higher then others just proves that they expect at some stage in the game another airline will vacate and this will make the script bug take effect
this is taking full advantage of a bug
hence cheating on known bugs within the game
#13
Posted 27 May 2007 - 05:16 AM
As i said, unless u know exactly what is happening and can prove it without a shadow of a doubt, then do so, but if not, dont expect many friends.
#14
Posted 27 May 2007 - 05:24 AM
Lets make this clear.. if i put 2-3 aircraft on a route, its because i want to clean it out.. unlike some who have 2-3 aircraft on a route to get a bug activation. I, myself, have a couple of routes with 2-3 aircraft and it aint to activate anything, just to get my point across to some players that feel like resetting every 10 secs... :sdrool:
As i said, unless u know exactly what is happening and can prove it without a shadow of a doubt, then do so, but if not, dont expect many friends.
hope u did not direct this reply to me?
i know u play like this and others know that u like to clear out annoying routes more annoying is a player who is on the game board 24/7 and keeps resetting their routes with plane swapping making all nose dive
my comment was in general as seen here
i do agree
this more than one type or plane and at times 2 or more and a ticket price higher then others just proves that they expect at some stage in the game another airline will vacate and this will make the script bug take effect
this is taking full advantage of a bug
hence cheating on known bugs within the game
#15
Posted 27 May 2007 - 05:42 AM
And what u said is a bit different, with people putting 2 or so aircraft on the route with higher prices waiting for the route to hit 100% LF. Thats is just so obvious that the person has no real interest in the game or understands the basic concept of it... sad to see really
#16
Posted 27 May 2007 - 08:01 AM
#17
Posted 27 May 2007 - 08:09 AM
good grief, activating a bug to gain advantage what a howler that is, how can i gain an advantage at 0$? <--- that's for you watchdog! your not as smart as you make out to be, I thought you might have learnt something in the time you have played this game but it seems I was wrong.
u read again my comments
i say higher ticket price also was made in general comments
then retract the attack
#18
Posted 28 May 2007 - 02:31 AM
Lets make this clear.. if i put 2-3 aircraft on a route, its because i want to clean it out.. unlike some who have 2-3 aircraft on a route to get a bug activation. I, myself, have a couple of routes with 2-3 aircraft and it aint to activate anything, just to get my point across to some players that feel like resetting every 10 secs... :sdrool:
Fair enough. I wasn't suggesting he is cheating in the same way some of the other posters suggest, only that from what I am seeing it seems he's experimenting with the game at the expense of other players. If that's not the case, then I have no gripe with that as a strategy. As I said, if there's a way to agree with other carriers on a route to fix a fare that doesn't require resetting, I'm in. If not, I'll just reset when I log on. That is, unfortunately, how the game is written.
#19
Posted 28 May 2007 - 02:33 AM
And my english is also not too bad, "MY" routes and "Routes that I fly" are totally different so I suggest that you in future write down what you you mean so it's crystal clear!
My apologies, I will endeavor to be ridiculously exact in the future for the benefit of those for whom English is not the first language. Your intepretation of what I wrote is not the one most people would adopt. So you know, "my routes" refers to those routes that appear on the screen of my computer when I click on "Routes" in the game. "My routes" therefore distinguishes those routes from other routes flown by other players with different airplanes, either to and from the same airports or other airports. It does not indicate claimed ownership or domination of any routes. Had I put the word "my" in italics or bold, your interpretation might become the majority one. But I did not.
#20
Posted 29 May 2007 - 08:58 AM
nglish is not the first language. Your intepretation of what I wrote is not the one most people would adopt. So you know, "my routes" refers to those routes that appear on the screen of my computer when I click on "Routes" in the game. "My routes" therefore distinguishes those routes from other routes flown by other players with different airplanes, either to and from the same airports or other airports. It does not indicate claimed ownership or domination of any routes. Had I put the word "my" in italics or bold, your interpretation might become the majority one. But I did not.
hmmm, info has been removed
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users