Would you fly on a Concorde?
#1
Posted 09 June 2016 - 01:11 PM
My answer would be yes, I would love to still have the possibility of flying supersonic, if I was BA I would try bringing back the Concorde because I feel like it would be a success especially now a days, where you could go from London to NY City in less than half the time of a normal flight.
Post your opinions.
C__Data_Users_DefApps_AppData_INTERNETEXPLORER_Temp_Saved Images_images(5).jpg 4.35KB 1 downloads
Also be sure to check out this post on bbc where people are trying to buy one and bring it back: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34301689
™
SKYWORLD ALLIANCE™ | Founder & Former CEO
UW | Former Member
#2
Posted 09 June 2016 - 01:26 PM
Yes and no.
Yes because it's supersonic.
No because I had to first fly to London or Paris while I also could go to Amsterdam and take a KLM flight direct instead of first flying to London or Paris.
#3
Posted 09 June 2016 - 01:30 PM
Yes and no.
Yes because it's supersonic.
No because I had to first fly to London or Paris while I also could go to Amsterdam and take a KLM flight direct instead of first flying to London or Paris.
Well if more airlines take it up then it will have more direct routes.
Only BA and Air France used it.
™
SKYWORLD ALLIANCE™ | Founder & Former CEO
UW | Former Member
#4
Posted 09 June 2016 - 02:07 PM
No.
#5
Posted 09 June 2016 - 02:35 PM
Well if more airlines take it up then it will have more direct routes.
Only BA and Air France used it.
And Singapore Airlines + Braniff (Short term lease)
For example LHR-JFK on a Concorde is 3 Hr. If I first have to go to LHR via AMS, I could better take a KLM 747 or 777 and fly direct to JFK. I don't think that KLM has any intrest in the Concorde if it would return.
#6
Posted 09 June 2016 - 02:40 PM
Unless someone makes one that wont spend so much in fuel.I don't think that KLM has any intrest in the Concorde if it would return.
™
SKYWORLD ALLIANCE™ | Founder & Former CEO
UW | Former Member
#7
Posted 09 June 2016 - 02:44 PM
Unless someone makes one that wont spend so much in fuel.
Don't think KLM would ever boy a supersonic a/c tbh.
#8
Posted 09 June 2016 - 02:50 PM
If someone can make the Concorde v2.0 that will use less fuel, gain more money and hold more seats then it might be worth more than a 747, the aircraft I like the most even tough it took over Concordes position.
™
SKYWORLD ALLIANCE™ | Founder & Former CEO
UW | Former Member
#9
Posted 09 June 2016 - 03:06 PM
No, they have no airworthiness
#10
Posted 09 June 2016 - 06:33 PM
#11
Posted 09 June 2016 - 06:35 PM
The Concorde is coming back in 2019, so I'll just wait then thanks
Yes but no news yet if any airlines will pick it up.
™
SKYWORLD ALLIANCE™ | Founder & Former CEO
UW | Former Member
#12
Posted 09 June 2016 - 07:33 PM
I would fly it, but the problem is the cost. I don't know if I've said this before, but my family can't really afford flying. I hope one day it will be my job and I will be able to take my family on trips all the time.
#13
Posted 10 June 2016 - 04:34 AM
#14
Posted 10 June 2016 - 06:26 AM
It's a good way to fly if you wanna get to your hotel.
I want my gays illegal and my racism married
#15
Posted 10 June 2016 - 06:52 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users