Jump to content

Photo

what if united airlines and continental airlines never merged


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

Poll: what if united airlines and continental airlines never merged (20 member(s) have cast votes)

will united airlines be different

  1. Yes...(post how united airlines will be different (2 votes [10.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 10.00%

  2. Voted United airlines will be the same (18 votes [90.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 90.00%

Will continental airlines be different

  1. Voted Yes...(post how continental airlines will be different) (6 votes [30.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 30.00%

  2. Voted Continental airlines will be the same as it was before the meger (14 votes [70.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 70.00%

Will things be better if the meger never happend

  1. Voted yes (12 votes [60.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 60.00%

  2. Voted no...(post saying why not) (8 votes [40.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 40.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1
Airplanepilot501

Airplanepilot501

    Private Pilot

  • Member
  • 57 posts

How will things be deffrent?


1312Low-plane-landing.gif

jmOio.jpg


#2
Hake.

Hake.

    Too Old For All This Jazz

  • Member
  • 4,295 posts
  • Skype Name:billfoster123
  • Website:http://willsweg.com

User's Awards

   8      
I wasn't aware of a merger? I only knew about the AA-US merger. Were the airlines having financial problems?
Edit: According to Wikipedia, they both were.

#3
SirMoo

SirMoo

    Rawr?

  • Member
  • 497 posts

I wasn't aware of a merger? I only knew about the AA-US merger. Were the airlines having financial problems?
Edit: According to Wikipedia, they both were.

 

Sort of no. It was just ideal. Their airlines did not really compete on any major turf. Both had also been looking for mergers in the past (US Airways was courted at one point).

 

But this hypothetical if they did not merge is dumb. Nothing would change for a few years. The merger was not needed for them to continue going.



#4
XFlight

XFlight

    AE Know It All

  • Member
  • 205 posts

"The livery world would be a lot better"

Always liked Continental's livery more then United's livery.


 

 

 


#5
the DOC

the DOC

    AE King

  • Member
  • 1,845 posts

User's Awards

2    3    4    3      

Always liked Continental's livery more then United's livery.

+1

 

Also, they were both apparently in a bit of a state so that's why I said they're better off merging



#6
Hake.

Hake.

    Too Old For All This Jazz

  • Member
  • 4,295 posts
  • Skype Name:billfoster123
  • Website:http://willsweg.com

User's Awards

   8      
Why do US airlines always merge? Can't they just die on their own? Many US airlines would have been shut down had they been anywhere else.

#7
XFlight

XFlight

    AE Know It All

  • Member
  • 205 posts
Why exactly would they have been shut down elsewhere?
 

 

 


#8
Hake.

Hake.

    Too Old For All This Jazz

  • Member
  • 4,295 posts
  • Skype Name:billfoster123
  • Website:http://willsweg.com

User's Awards

   8      
Becausevthey wouldn't have merged and wiuld have gone bankrupt instead.

#9
SirMoo

SirMoo

    Rawr?

  • Member
  • 497 posts

Why do US airlines always merge? Can't they just die on their own? Many US airlines would have been shut down had they been anywhere else.

 

No recent major mergers are from airlines that would have gone bankrupt. Don't confuse bankruptcy protection for bankrupt.

 

Your comment is pretty dumb Hake. Very few would have been shut down. The merge because there is still money in it.

 

Take US AA for example.. AA wasn't bankrupt. However, it was having a problem that it couldn't get enough money so it entered protection to prevent certain debts from having to be paid.

 

You want them to just go bankrupt? That would be awful. Boeing and Airbus would both lose a s*** ton of money. The US airline market would suddenly have a HUGE hole in major markets like Dallas where AA runs 80% of the flights. Prices would sky rocket as there would be dramatically less competition. British Airways and Qantas would suffer a loss in demand in their US flights as no one would be bringing flights to their destinations.

 

Airlines dying in the US is pretty detrimental to the market for the whole word.

 

But your statement was also false. Look at British Airways and Iberia. Or KLM and Air France. Or all the airlines that Lufthansa injects with cash.



#10
Hake.

Hake.

    Too Old For All This Jazz

  • Member
  • 4,295 posts
  • Skype Name:billfoster123
  • Website:http://willsweg.com

User's Awards

   8      

No recent major mergers are from airlines that would have gone bankrupt. Don't confuse bankruptcy protection for bankrupt.
 
Your comment is pretty dumb Hake. Very few would have been shut down. The merge because there is still money in it.
 
Take US AA for example.. AA wasn't bankrupt. However, it was having a problem that it couldn't get enough money so it entered protection to prevent certain debts from having to be paid.
 
You want them to just go bankrupt? That would be awful. Boeing and Airbus would both lose a s*** ton of money. The US airline market would suddenly have a HUGE hole in major markets like Dallas where AA runs 80% of the flights. Prices would sky rocket as there would be dramatically less competition. British Airways and Qantas would suffer a loss in demand in their US flights as no one would be bringing flights to their destinations.
 
Airlines dying in the US is pretty detrimental to the market for the whole word.
 
But your statement was also false. Look at British Airways and Iberia. Or KLM and Air France. Or all the airlines that Lufthansa injects with cash.

Yes, I accept your viewpoint. Also, I feel I worded the post wrong. I never meant that I wanted airlines to shut down; damage would be detrimental to some economies. Also, I know the US-AA merger was neccesary. I was just wondering aloud why a lot of airlines have gone bankrupt (Malev, BMIbaby) and some more. After conisderable thought into this I realised that there isn't the appetite for keeping these airlines going. It is probably see as cheaper to take the airline's route's after they're gone instead of buying, streamlining, restructuring and more.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users