Should there be a restriction on players repeating the same game worlds?

There are certain game worlds where you're almost certain to see the same players every time. Sometimes they might pick a different airline name & logo, just to remain inconspicuous, or sometimes it's just that same name & logo in the same game world over & over & over again.

And I'm not talking about inexperienced players. These guys dominate, & seem obsessed to be bigger & badder every time. And in some respects there's nothing necessarily wrong with that. I like to win, & have won many times. But I try not to hog the first place spot, at least not in the same game world every single time. When the game world ends, I'm happy to give someone else a go while I go play somewhere else next time. A change of timeline, location, strategy & aircraft helps keep it interesting.

But not some people. Which got me thinking, do you think that there should be some kind of restriction on playing in the same game world again immediately after your last game in that world just ended? You can come back to it later if it's your favourite game world, but you have to at least have to sit every second rollover out. All designed to give an entire new set of players a chance to succeed there.

What do you think?

I don’t think so. There’s a variety of reasons why players might want to stay in one game world. After all, the game incentivizes it with worlds such as S1 and S2 having unique rules and the fact the world immediately resets after your previous airline closes, which allows you to start right at the beginning again.

the reason you think this is because you are a spamliner. 

cope harder sir

also since you want to restrict airlines for no reason, can we restrict airlines with unrealistic fleets, configurations and daily utilisation rates, such as the example below:

http://ae31.airline-...ae3rd&player=35

Just a suggestion!

cope harder sir

Not a problem. Was just an innocent question.

cope harder sir

Not a problem. Was just an innocent question.

also since you want to restrict airlines for no reason, can we restrict airlines with unrealistic fleets, configurations and daily utilisation rates, such as the example below:

http://ae31.airline-...ae3rd&player=35

 

Just a suggestion!

Not me.

cope harder sir

Not a problem. Was just an innocent question.

also since you want to restrict airlines for no reason, can we restrict airlines with unrealistic fleets, configurations and daily utilisation rates, such as the example below:

http://ae31.airline-...ae3rd&player=35

 

Just a suggestion!

Not me.

the reason you think this is because you are a spamliner. 

Optimal strategist, if you please.

cope harder sir

Not a problem. Was just an innocent question.

also since you want to restrict airlines for no reason, can we restrict airlines with unrealistic fleets, configurations and daily utilisation rates, such as the example below:

http://ae31.airline-...ae3rd&player=35

 

Just a suggestion!

Not me.

the reason you think this is because you are a spamliner. 

Optimal strategist, if you please.

I don’t think so. There’s a variety of reasons why players might want to stay in one game world. After all, the game incentivizes it with worlds such as S1 and S2 having unique rules and the fact the world immediately resets after your previous airline closes, which allows you to start right at the beginning again.

Thanks for your comment. I appreciate your opinion.

There's nothing stopping you, with your vast amount of trophies, from bankrupting your own airlines and leading by example. 

also why did you post the same thing three different times but with another quote

also why did you post the same thing three different times but with another quote

big brain time

I don't know, without active spamliner, this website would be dead.

what the hell is this airline of yours?

http://ae31.airline-...ae3o1&player=23

what the hell is this airline of yours?

http://ae31.airline-...ae3o1&player=23

they get a pass for having low utilization 

they get a pass for having low utilization 

they get a pass for having low utilization 

If "realistic airlines" got a pass for operating flights between LGA and JFK or for using TU-214 on American soil. Then spamliners should get a pass for low utilization rate no?

If "realistic airlines" got a pass for operating flights between LGA and JFK or for using TU-214 on American soil. Then spamliners should get a pass for low utilization rate no?

While hate the fact, this is a fair reason unfortunately

Like, today using a Sukhoi SSJ is western Europe seems absolutely insane...but CityJet did just that for years, even fully Brussels Airlines branded.