which is the worst plane if it spends a lot of fuel or if it has no reach or spends a lot of fuel and has low capacity
#1
Posted 14 June 2020 - 11:23 PM
#2
Posted 15 June 2020 - 08:04 PM
#3
Posted 16 June 2020 - 09:16 AM
Have you heard the story about the violin being sold at auction that looked so crappy and worthless that they couldn't even get a starting bid for it. Then an old man got up from the audience, took the violin, and started to play it. When the audience heard the beautiful music it made when played in the hands of an expert who knew and understood the instrument, the bidding started in a frenzy and it sold for a record price.
It's just a fable, but the point is if you know and understand the aircraft, and how this game works, there's no such thing as "worst aircraft".
#4
Posted 20 June 2020 - 05:25 AM
I say the Illyushin Il-86
What are you talking about, I've made loads of money on the thing
jomama
#5
Posted 20 June 2020 - 05:30 AM
In regards to the worst I think its the Concorde and Tu-144. They only exist as a show off plane and won't make any money at all, at least a An-2, King Air or even Beechcraft Bonanza can fly into rather small and short airfields, a Bell 214 can still use a helipad but the Concorde and Tu-144 eat up fuel like no tomorrow, has less then 150 seats which is not good for aircraft meant to fly long ranges and requires massive runways. Nice plane to show off how much money your carrier makes but not good for actually make jack s***.
jomama
#6
Posted 05 July 2020 - 01:52 PM
Concorde. Tu-144. Tu-104. Fuel-thirsty 1st gen jets such as the 707-220/420 or DC-8-20/30/40. Hard to make significant profits with these!
#7
Posted 31 July 2020 - 08:55 AM
You'll always find a better option than the A340-500.
"I'm not ashamed of the things I've done; I took the plane when I should have run" - Stuart Adamson
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users