Jump to content

Photo

B739 use


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1
kenji

kenji

    AE Addict To-Be

  • Member
  • 12 posts
Can someone tells me what's the use of B739 when there is a B738 around?

#2
bolli

bolli

    ae4ever

  • Member
  • 1,201 posts
Not a lot :P
Boeing Screwed up ;)

Porn in spoiler:

Spoiler


#3
Conor

Conor

    Angry Irishman

  • AE Moderator
  • 1,404 posts

Not a lot :P
Boeing Screwed up ;)


I dont think they screwed up i think it was more of a hmmmm this might work, well actually its kind of pointless but lets show the world we can do it anyway :P

#4
LLC

LLC

    AE Luver

  • Member
  • 461 posts
Stick with the Boeing 737-800,
I think that airlineempires messed up the seats and/or the range as
most real-life airlines put more seats in their B737-900's than allowed here
(The 737-900 was to be a B757 replacement)


Name , Family , Average Speed , Max Seats , Maximum Range
Turn Time , Base Hourly Cost , Average Min. Runway Length , Base Price , Monthly Lease
Addons , Delivery Starts , Production Ends

Boeing 737-800 , 737NG , 450 mph , 189
3,337 mi , 35 min , $2,478 , 6,248 ft , $61,000,000 , $677,778
Winglets , May 18, 1998 , End of 2025
Boeing 737-800 Info (@ airlineempires)

Boeing 737-900 , 737NG , 460 mph , 189
2,745 mi , 40 min , $3,138 , 6,715 ft , $65,000,000 , $722,222
Winglets , October 19, 2000 , End of 2025
Boeing 737-900 Info (@ airlineempires)

Boeing 737-900ER , 737NG , 460 mph , 215
3,200 mi , 40 min , $3,342 , 7,191 ft , $70,500,000 , $783,333
Winglets , TBA 2006 , End of 2025
Boeing 737-900ER Info (@ airlineempires)

#5
Bins16

Bins16

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 292 posts

Stick with the Boeing 737-800,
I think that airlineempires messed up the seats and/or the range as
most real-life airlines put more seats in their B737-900's than allowed here
(The 737-900 was to be a B757 replacement)


WRONG XP .
Due to keeping the same amount of exits as the 738 (and the lack of an attempt to certify if for more), the the 739 can only hold 189.
The 739ER corrects this, I reported this earlier too :P .
But in real life, the 739 can hold more in a two class config than a 738 ( since the amount of passengers is limited, not the space).

Xpress


Member since 2006


Posted Image


#6
Yuxi

Yuxi

    AE Developer

  • AE Developer
  • 4,364 posts

WRONG XP .
Due to keeping the same amount of exits as the 738 (and the lack of an attempt to certify if for more), the the 739 can only hold 189.
The 739ER corrects this, I reported this earlier too :P .
But in real life, the 739 can hold more in a two class config than a 738 ( since the amount of passengers is limited, not the space).


Yep. The 739 is longer than the 738, so you're trading range for capacity. In theory they both have the same 189 certified seat limit, but in practice the 739's increased length allows you to fit more seats in (very helpful for > 1 class configs). :)

For AE however, the additional length makes no difference because the cabin capacity is determined by the max certified limit, so in-game the 739 is kind of pointless. :/ Wait for the 739ER ;)

#7
Spenser

Spenser

    Global Forum Moderator/Data Collector

  • Veteran
  • 516 posts
Dont forget that in real life the 900 has had very little success. Continental and Alaska are the only operators in North American with a limited fleet.
Flown in-A319, A320, 717, 737-300, 737-700, 737-800, 757-200, 757-300, 767-200ER, 767-300, 767-300ER, MD-11, MD-82, MD-83, MD-88, MD-90, L-1011 Tristar, DC-10, CRJ-200, CRJ-700, CRJ-900, Dash 8 (100 and 300), Saab 340, ERJ-175




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users