Jump to content

Photo

BAN SPAMLINERS!!!!

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#21
hayhaa

hayhaa

    christs sake

  • Member
  • 1,681 posts

User's Awards

2      
get a new one!!!

#22
Panzer

Panzer

    New Member

  • Member
  • 6 posts

Anwering to OP, I feel the "normal" spamliners are kinda okay (dump a lot of flights, hogging all the gates thing), what I hate the most is the 1$ Spamliner and they should be banned imo (plus if they do some personal insult through PM and I can't or at least I don't know) where to report or block it...



#23
v35n

v35n

    Hi

  • Member
  • 224 posts

User's Awards

           

Impossible. B777-300 have maximum certified capacity of 550 passengers. While A330-200 only certified to carry maximum of 406 passengers.
 
Many real life LCC kill off many Full service airlines around the world. From India, Indonesia, EU, even the US.

Okay so firstly the LCCs are mostly found in the US there shouldn’t not be a ‘even’ as American LCCs are crazy for turning a $600 route to a $100 one that means that aircraft, even with scam IFS, are losing money.

And also many LCC in real life they just squeeze as many passengers as possible, so on the A330-200 they will carry 406 passengers which is the exit limit. But take note, the 406 seats on the A330-200 is crazy as the exit limit does not mean the maximum seats they can squeeze. Take the 777-300, their exit limit is 550 but it will be extremely unrealistic to fit 550Y seats as the area is too little.

#24
Pineair

Pineair

    AE Luver

  • Member
  • 474 posts

User's Awards

10    16    12       9   
Play in one of the S3 worlds where the number of active airlines is limited to 100.

#25
Guest_Adam0896_*

Guest_Adam0896_*
  • Guests

1. This isn't going to happen

2. No we're not just gonna be able to get a new dev team

3. People need to stop asking the same damn question. Nothing is changing.



#26
TNT88

TNT88

    Hates Pedo

  • Member
  • 3,458 posts

User's Awards

2    14       71      

Okay so firstly the LCCs are mostly found in the US there shouldn’t not be a ‘even’ as American LCCs are crazy for turning a $600 route to a $100 one that means that aircraft, even with scam IFS, are losing money.

And also many LCC in real life they just squeeze as many passengers as possible, so on the A330-200 they will carry 406 passengers which is the exit limit. But take note, the 406 seats on the A330-200 is crazy as the exit limit does not mean the maximum seats they can squeeze. Take the 777-300, their exit limit is 550 but it will be extremely unrealistic to fit 550Y seats as the area is too little.

 

Boeing published 550-seat configurations for B777-300. The certifications are based on a test that each aircraft have to be evacuated using half of the exit within 90 seconds.



#27
Milu

Milu

    New Member

  • Member
  • 6 posts

User's Awards

     

So is it bad to try reach top 10 by valuation?



#28
Preston

Preston

    AE Luver

  • Member
  • 252 posts

So is it bad to try reach top 10 by valuation?

What do you mean?



#29
Milu

Milu

    New Member

  • Member
  • 6 posts

User's Awards

     

What is different between spamliners and serious players?



#30
Curtis

Curtis

    Anglo-Franco-Mauritian Baguette and Flight Delay Specialist

  • Member
  • 13 posts

What is different between spamliners and serious players?

A serious player could run a spamliner or any sort of carrier to be honest. It's just that some people view spamliners as an annoyance that stops them and others from running a slightly more realistic airline (especially in terms of how many seats they provide in relation to demand). For example, a spamliner could try and take over your route, but instead of offering either a slightly cheaper ticket or better ifs, they just stick multiple flights on to the point it massively exceeds demand. To make it worse, many stick the price at $1 as well to basically render your flights empty. The reason it works is because the connecting passenger mechanics are sort of broken. So I can sort of see why people do get annoyed at them.



#31
Milu

Milu

    New Member

  • Member
  • 6 posts

User's Awards

     

A serious player could run a spamliner or any sort of carrier to be honest. It's just that some people view spamliners as an annoyance that stops them and others from running a slightly more realistic airline (especially in terms of how many seats they provide in relation to demand). For example, a spamliner could try and take over your route, but instead of offering either a slightly cheaper ticket or better ifs, they just stick multiple flights on to the point it massively exceeds demand. To make it worse, many stick the price at $1 as well to basically render your flights empty. The reason it works is because the connecting passenger mechanics are sort of broken. So I can sort of see why people do get annoyed at them.

Thanks. Now I fully understand others point of view. But many things need change. Maybe AE 3.2 or 4.0 or simply some special world .

 

I have another question. Is number of gates increase over time or they just fixed at each world?

 

Maybe we need increase gates over time and some queue system which people can reserved future gates if they are not owned more than 20 percent of current gates for local airlines and 10 percent for foreigner airlines (number are just example). They pay some $$$ in advanced and those gates reserved for them when available (each 5 year for example) and return automatically if not used for longer time than normal gates. maybe some limitation for number of gates anyone can reserved in advanced.

And if someone return a gate or automatically a gate is return, those gates also go to queue system to prevent people create another airline or account and reserved some gates for future in a wrong way.


Edited by Milu, 26 September 2018 - 03:16 PM.


#32
TNT88

TNT88

    Hates Pedo

  • Member
  • 3,458 posts

User's Awards

2    14       71      
Spamliners are just Emirates on extreme mode.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users