79 replies to this topic

[Pasti]

So, any news?

[hayhaa]

So, any news?

everyone gets a participation trophy )

[Avelo]

everyone gets a participation trophy )

Thank God I dropped out of this contest, because participation trophies are worthless.

[Pasti]

Thank God I dropped out of this contest, because participation trophies are worthless.

You realize he’s kidding?

[Boeing Flight Simmer]

Voting is happening as we speak. sorry about the delay. 

[TNT88]

Voting is happening as we speak. sorry about the delay. 

Would my post be allowed to enter the competition?

[Med.]

Alright... so many submitted tattooed airplanes.

[TNT88]

Alright... so many submitted tattooed airplanes.

 

Well, it is Southeast Asia and Oceania. 

[Med.]

So far, here are my feedback:

 

Malayair - 30/100 Very unconvincing font. Uneducated use of negative space in logo design. Overall generic design with little thought put into it.

AussieHopper - 90/100 Very interesting theme design. Very Australian. Inspired by Qantas sure, but unique in itself. I wish the tail pattern "fit" into the aircraft better.

Vietfly - 30/100 VietJet ripoff. Logo has completely failed. But at least the whole thing looks balanced.

Solomonese - 80/100 Very well balanced. Good visibility and classic look. I like it, but I need to love it for this to win.

Batavian.com  -25/100 Lazy choice of font considering a very stylish logo. Just strap on a tattoo and call it a day. Boring!

AirPacifique - 60/100 Props for the effort. But I guess this overshot a bit. Halftone + brushstroke + tattoo = too cluttered.

Transpacifica - 70/100 The tail works somehow! Placement of font just failed because of the unreadability. Also why is there a swoosh in the sun in the logo but a circle on the tail?

Singapura - 40/100 I just saw so much potential that did not happen. Lacks finesse. But I respect how you dare to go beyond the stereotypes.

FlyPacific - 20/100 Lazy design. PNG from the net. Generic font. Tail and engine color. Done. Next!

Solint - 60/100 This had so much potential. The shark, the blue, the green, the gold, it could have worked. But the tattoo just ruined it. Lazy way to add detail in this case.

Fijian - 95/100 Just beautiful. I would like to see this in real life. This is a tattoo design that works.

IndoJet - 100/100 Finally! A brand that works! Well composed logo! Good contrast, clean lines. Plus the logo and the font HELP each other UNIFY the name and the look.

Pacifico - 30/100 Very amature design. It has that default FSX livery vibe to it. Meaningless swooshes and lazy use of tattoo. At least it looks balanced and not hurt the eyes.

Mahal Indian Airlines - 40/100 The moustache is an interesting touch. Logo is too shy. Font does not really look solid.

Kiwings - 15/100 It took a while to understand the star-K logo. Cornered font, curvy swoosh, then some random white angled line. What were you thinking? Plus that star thing from the flag to finish it off?

Itaukei - 60/100 Clean design. Cheerful tail. But it is a look we have seen before.

 

It turns out my top 3 are

 

AussieHopper, Fijian and Indojet

 

Aussiehopper is very pleasing to the eye.

Fijian would be a really interesting design to see in real life.

Indojet is the most mature design of this batch and the winner for me. I see much consideration to help the brand be recognizable. Well proportioned logo and a font that just makes the logo look even better. It looks very professional.

[Pasti]

Well, I’ll take a 60/100

Good job to everyone, especially the winners! Though, I feel the judges should’ve really elaborated on why they gave the scores they gave like what Boing did.

[TNT88]

I mean, the top 3 are great, but wow, I thought Air Pacifique or FlyPacific gonna win this one.

Although, Singapura is probably the underdog. It's Bold, Unique and Extremely Memorable, which is lacking in other liveries. 

[OtakuWeebster!]

I'll take 70/100

Congrats to everyone! I had fun making it.

[dondee]

3rd place ain't too shabby at all.

 

Congrats to all the participants. There were so many beautiful submissions that I must admit were better than mine. Bet it was quite difficult for the judges themselves.

[Speed Bird]

@Med

 

Can you explain the score for Singapura?

 

For me it has to be the best of the lot.

[Leebro]

Me getting a 30/100 seems quite fair since I was really tired from school works and stuff. I intended to make an updated design but I didn't have the time to do so.

 

Well, I guess that means I will improve it so that it looks good in the galleries. And I have a long break so that should give me a lot of time but I might have to work with Singa Pacific

[Med.]

@Med

 

Can you explain the score for Singapura?

 

For me it has to be the best of the lot.

 

It looks nice yes. But this isn't about looking nice. The Singapura brand feels incomplete and forgettable. There was so many things that could have been done to make it a solid brand. For example, the merlion logo could have been made in a way that is truly his own unique way. I like that the designer mixed up the placement of objects in a more unique way, and the yellow top, but in the end it's just a generic livery with (probably) ripped from google images logo. 40/100

[POTKC]

Wow, 80/100, I feel honored! I get what you mean, it's 'likable, but not lovable'. Still, I'm pretty happy with 80.

[Boeing Flight Simmer]

Congrats to the winners!

 

1st. Indojet,

 

2nd. Fijian,

 

3ed. Aussie Hopper,

 

Runner up. Solomonese 

[5280_Av8r]

I haven't really been paying attention that much because of school, but holy cow, I wasn't expecting first place!! Thanks for giving me 100/100 on my IndoJet Airline!! I feel honored. I'd like to thank SKY for giving me ideas on ways to tweak IndoJet into a great brand.

[Med.]

Congratulations to the winners and participants!