Jump to content

Photo

A320-100 is underrated.


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1
JordanPlays

JordanPlays

    AE Addict To-Be

  • Member
  • 15 posts
A320-100 is underrated. Sure you can only order it for 2 years but it’s so good.

#2
Pacific

Pacific

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 1,013 posts

User's Awards

2       2      

The A320-200 costs less per seat and burns the same amount of fuel.


qRn0iGD.png

#3
snoopy1212

snoopy1212

    AE Player

  • Member
  • 37 posts

And every airline nowadays uses the -200. Just read up the reason why it even exists and the reason that the -200 is the better choice will be evident.



#4
KJS607

KJS607

    The O.G. Savage

  • Member
  • 3,860 posts
  • Website:https://www.thetravelsavage.com/

User's Awards

6       3   

The -200 series is an improved variant of the -100 :P


msg-1341-0-50048700-1680446869_thumb.png

 

I did a thing: thetravelsavage.com

 


#5
littlewill1166

littlewill1166

    AE Player

  • Member
  • 50 posts

User's Awards

3    2       7   

The A320-200 costs less per seat and burns the same amount of fuel.

After adding sharklets right?



#6
KJS607

KJS607

    The O.G. Savage

  • Member
  • 3,860 posts
  • Website:https://www.thetravelsavage.com/

User's Awards

6       3   

After adding sharklets right?

 

The -200 series features wingtip fences and aerodynamic improvements over the -100 series already. Both can be fitted with sharklets.


msg-1341-0-50048700-1680446869_thumb.png

 

I did a thing: thetravelsavage.com

 


#7
Shammy

Shammy

    AE Senior yet to be

  • Member
  • 72 posts
The -200 is just bettah

5_Member_Sig.png

 

2rxgvt2.png





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users