Jump to content

Photo

What is your favorite aircraft in the game?


  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

#1
mastacheifa118

mastacheifa118

    A trombone player

  • Member
  • 92 posts

Mine is clearly the Boeing 757-200/-300, with a generous max range and capacity while still being small enough to operate to smaller airports, and being cheaper than widebodies and some narrowbodies. Nothing really comes close to replacing it until the 737-900ER or the A321NEO, both of which lack the capacity of the 757.



#2
Jamesthomeson

Jamesthomeson

    Desperate to Fly

  • Member
  • 451 posts
I'm gonna have to go with the 777-300. It has better everything than the 777-300er, and with the engine I use it is highly profitable on all routes.
t4lPIvQ.jpgUjfJ0sC.png

#3
colombian_aviator

colombian_aviator

    SpaceX fan + Hardbass addict

  • Member
  • 135 posts

777-200 just beacuse of range, I made the mistake to order 10 777-300s and then I found out they will only reach a small part of Europe. *cough* we need stopovers urgently *cough*


rush b cyka


#4
sugarpie honeybun

sugarpie honeybun

    AE Player

  • Member
  • 44 posts
CL-44 Yukon is pretty cheap, has a long range and large capacity. The only thing that can replace CL-44 is another CL-44.

#5
SirMS

SirMS

    New Member

  • Member
  • 8 posts

User's Awards

3   

757-300, extremely versatile and, unfortunately, irreplaceable. And of course, A320-200 is a staple for short haul. 



#6
trans25c

trans25c

    AE Player

  • Member
  • 39 posts

Beech 1900D Because of its great capabilities.I once operated an airline with 25 beechcraft only and it made a good profit



#7
Stevphfeniey

Stevphfeniey

    Bad m*****f*****

  • Member
  • 4,249 posts
  • Website:http://stevphfeniey.tumblr.com/

The Tu-144 and Concorde because I'm not a little bitch


please don't kill us we're just the aquabats

 

The Best Discord Server


#8
westonallen0990

westonallen0990

    CEO

  • Member
  • 58 posts

Short Haul - B717-200

Medium Haul - B757-300

Long Haul - B767-400ER


Planes I've flown onboard: 747-400 (3x), 747-300 (1x), 757-200 (11x), 767-300ER (3x), 767-300 (1x), 757-300 (4x), 737-800 (3x), CRJ200 (4x), MD-11 (2x), 777-200 (2x), Q400 (2x), E175 (2x), 717-200 (3x), A321 (1), A320 (5x), A319 (1x), A340-300 (1x), American Champion 8KCAB Decathlon (1x), C152 (Hundreds of Times), C150 (~50 times), C172 (14x), A310-300 (5x), A330-200 (3x)

Flown with (In no particular order): Air Canada, KLM, United, United Express, US Airways, US Airways Shuttle, WestJet, Air Transat, Air Wisconsin, ExpressJet, Air Georgian, Icelandair, Thomas Cook Airlines, Canada 3000, euroAtlantic, American Airlines, Porter, Martinair, Mesa Airlines, Hawaiian Airlines, Air Canada Express, GoJet, SkyService, 

 


#9
colombian_aviator

colombian_aviator

    SpaceX fan + Hardbass addict

  • Member
  • 135 posts

Seems like we need more 777 love in this game


rush b cyka


#10
dazwalsh

dazwalsh

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 438 posts
A330-300, also like the fokker 70/100 for regional stuff that doesnt get much love in the game.

#11
Go Fly ATL

Go Fly ATL

    Member

  • Member
  • 133 posts

User's Awards

   7    2    10   

717 and 753!



#12
sierra_tango

sierra_tango

    Aviation Enthusiast

  • Member
  • 15 posts

A330-300, also like the fokker 70/100 for regional stuff that doesnt get much love in the game.

 

Are the fokkers actually profitable in routes below 1000mi? I am always thinking of buying them but that 13000+ of fuel consuption is keeping me away from them.



#13
Guest_CometBlue_*

Guest_CometBlue_*
  • Guests

Turboprops are my bois.



#14
Jamesthomeson

Jamesthomeson

    Desperate to Fly

  • Member
  • 451 posts

Are the fokkers actually profitable in routes below 1000mi? I am always thinking of buying them but that 13000+ of fuel consuption is keeping me away from them.

The F-100 is decent for profit. I tried F-70 once and made sure to replace them as soon as the CRJs came out. You should never order the f-70. It can survive a route run by just you but as soon as competition rolls in don't even think about beating their price.
t4lPIvQ.jpgUjfJ0sC.png

#15
xwb_777

xwb_777

    New Member

  • Member
  • 7 posts

User's Awards

13    4         

The A330-300 



#16
ResidentEVO

ResidentEVO

    AE Know It All

  • Member
  • 104 posts

User's Awards

3   

Are the fokkers actually profitable in routes below 1000mi? I am always thinking of buying them but that 13000+ of fuel consuption is keeping me away from them.


I made an entire airline in California running Fokker 100 and EMB-120s. Pullled profits even with a realistic IFS and salaries.

#17
Hans.

Hans.

    I just really like airplanes

  • Member
  • 188 posts

User's Awards

   3   

I made an entire airline in California running Fokker 100 and EMB-120s. Pullled profits even with a realistic IFS and salaries.

F100 can work pretty well, but I found BAe 146s and Avro RJs to work better. They're a little bit slower, but you can configure them in a lot of different ways and carry a lot of pax for their size.


   uw_sig2.png

 

 


#18
dundun92

dundun92

    Fortnite is cancer lol

  • Member
  • 1,301 posts
  • Website:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=UU0-7L3Z5nJ-QUX5M7Dh1pGg

User's Awards

2   
737-500 for short haul
767-200/300 med haul
747-400 long haul

Windows 7 is superior, change my mind


#19
dead pigeon?

dead pigeon?

    nobody's friend

  • Member
  • 140 posts

not my favorite aircraft, but when I was trying to operate long haul out of MDW, SAT, and SMF, the 747-400D was super helpful because its runway requirement is super low



#20
Max Devo

Max Devo

    Extra spicy memes

  • Member
  • 363 posts

Il-18 for relatively early games. Capacity of a 737-200 with a whole lotta range and impressive fuel efficiency.


tumblr_nfjii5i0Ky1sorz3uo1_250.jpg





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users