55 replies to this topic

[Stevphfeniey]

We've all been there. Stuck competing with Qantas on London to Rome because some dumb ******* decided to plop Australia's national airline in Italy. God knows why people do this, but the leading research points to the fact that people are ****ing retarded. But that's not why I'm here.

 

I'm here to offer a solution that's been implemented in other airline simulators online.

 

Ban the use of active airline names in-game. Force people to get at least a little bit creative.

 

Should solve that problem nice and tidy.

[Bradimir]

Y E S B O Y E

[Bacon]

For once I agree with you.

[Pasti]

Is very good plan +1

[Arianka]

I agree! It's time to stop this madness! 

[0M4R]

YES

[LATAM]

Well for those that do national carriers correctly, there should be an option where all IRL airlines that exist/have existed are available through a drop-down menu and they automatically get their 5 gates at the airlines RL HQ? 

 

As someone who enjoys role-playing IRL airlines, i agree its distressing to see Quantas on London to Rome but there are people who run national carriers correctly, including   Universal Alliance.

 

So while I support what you suggest, there should be a drop down menu if you want to create a IRL airline and do it through a drop down menu with options given to you. 

 

LATAM 

[Jason Hite]

Well for those that do national carriers correctly, there should be an option where all IRL airlines that exist/have existed are available through a drop-down menu and they automatically get their 5 gates at the airlines RL HQ? 

 

As someone who enjoys role-playing IRL airlines, i agree its distressing to see Qantas on London to Rome but there are people who run national carriers correctly, including   Universal Alliance.

 

So while I support what you suggest, there should be a drop down menu if you want to create a IRL airline and do it through a drop down menu with options given to you. 

 

LATAM 

I think this is the solution to this problem. Having IRL airlines is not a problem. Having them in the wrong country/HQ is. This would definitely solve the problem without making it so that your airline has to have a non-real world identity and someone of us (like me) are just not that creative. I love trying to model airlines after real world entities.

[namika]

I think the carrier should only exist in the home country where IRL they are located

[Zacca]

you guys have nice ideas

[bAnderson]

We've all been there. Stuck competing with Qantas on London to Rome because some dumb ******* decided to plop Australia's national airline in Italy. God knows why people do this, but the leading research points to the fact that people are ****ing retarded. But that's not why I'm here.

 

I'm here to offer a solution that's been implemented in other airline simulators online.

 

Ban the use of active airline names in-game. Force people to get at least a little bit creative.

 

Should solve that problem nice and tidy.

Also gets rid of Universal... 

[Infestation]

United Spain based in japan in Ra. They are also spamlining. I can't compete...

[tom.]

I agree and WANT THIS APPROVED +1

[LATAM]

Also gets rid of Universal... 

and your problem with Universal would be? 

 

LATAM 

[Infestation]

and your problem with Universal would be? 
 
LATAM

[Infestation]

This happened....

Attached Files

•  IMG_2806.PNG   721.91KB   0 downloads

[zipp]

the misspelling of qantas upsets me more than the time i was booted from DWA

[bAnderson]

and your problem with Universal would be? 

 

LATAM 

Universal is like the cross country team of AE lol

[Chubby Bear]

I completely agree and approve of this notion. +1