Well you like to win cheating with no sense of the game. YOU WIN! with cheating. and you applaud!? . I hope their trolls/bots and double accounts agree with you.
And have no proud winning if that manner. exploiting awards.
The first place in this server is in 16 place.
World Rα has so many spamlines
#41
Posted 19 November 2017 - 03:20 AM
#42
Posted 19 November 2017 - 03:32 AM
Well you like to win cheating with no sense of the game. YOU WIN! with cheating. and you applaud!? . I hope their trolls/bots and double accounts agree with you.
And have no proud winning if that manner. exploiting awards.
The first place in this server is in 16 place.
Those are bots doing the work?
#43
Posted 19 November 2017 - 03:43 AM
So long as there are NO all-economy 747s or A380s. There's a stigma that goes with flying these kinds of planes in just one class, and one infamous LCC from the past, People Express, had to learn their lesson the hard way when flying all-economy 747s would play a role in bankrupting them.
well it happened, so no. we will not be enforcing all-economy widebodies, even if they're annoying
#44
Posted 19 November 2017 - 03:46 AM
Those are bots doing the work?
see yourself
http://ae31.airline-...php?world=ae3ra
compare the SPAMLINER flood airlines like 15 at same time with the other players.
__________________++
__________________.Eo
___________________zEE;_________________________:
____________________EEEn_____________________:oS;
_____________________EEEE:__:-_____-lcneEg+.*EE--
_____________________*EEOEOEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE-oOEV
____________:;;--+++-oEEOEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
__.:::::::.______::::__*CEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEglCS
_.:-+++++++oEECgr**ll*VEECCJJogOEEE::EE__:E
____________;nEE:_______+*El+E-.
Carlos "SUJETO" Vargas Sánchez.
#45
Posted 19 November 2017 - 03:53 AM
It's more up to the devs to change the mechanics of the game so it becomes more desirable to expand a little more "realistically" imo. I used to have a FRA hub in AE classic, spammed out FRA-CGN and other shorthauls just so I can compete on the longhauls through the hub passenger flow.
#46
Posted 19 November 2017 - 04:19 AM
see yourself
http://ae31.airline-...php?world=ae3ra
compare the SPAMLINER flood airlines like 15 at same time with the other players.
Oh yes! That airline "1" basically has a hub in ever airport in france!!
#47
Posted 19 November 2017 - 10:20 AM
Bruh, It's neato that you exploited the loophole, but don't be a d*****. Other people enjoy playing. Like I said tho, your loophole-breaking is impressive.
OK, I'm new here, so I don't understand the loophole that makes some of this spamlining work. In this world, for example, airline 'j' has 113 flights per day between ATW and OSH (a 20 minute drive with a car), all with 727s and TU-154s. Put aside that in the real world no commercial flights ever went between Appleton and Oshkosh, why would flooding that tiny, short route make any money or help logistics elsewhere?
#48
Posted 19 November 2017 - 10:59 AM
Scam IFS exploit/strategy. Pax will purchase the worst IFS at top price no matter how short the route it seems.
#49
Posted 19 November 2017 - 11:06 AM
There, that's the "cheat."
Most of you already know this but still can't get close to The Empire.
Certainly none of the girls whining in this thread have the smarts/efficiency to match me.
But hey - That's all you need to know. Now try to beat me.
#50
Posted 19 November 2017 - 12:24 PM
@Pacific - got it, thanks. Not very realistic as a business model. I suppose there's a tension between those treating this as a simulation versus a simple numbers game.
#51
Posted 19 November 2017 - 02:59 PM
Just stop complaining so much, put your big boy pants on and confront the problem directly if it bothers you so much.
TL;DR nut up or shut up its really not that bad
#52
Posted 19 November 2017 - 07:30 PM
I will note that it is supremely easy to avoid most of these airlines y'all are whining about. See a route occupied by a gigantic airline spamming it to s***? Fly another route and come back to the original one later. Use their strategies to compete with them if you can (much easier to do in developed countries than others). And do you really need a 50% profit margin or that trophy? By all measures I run my airlines with horrible inefficiency, but they can still maintain losses in the hundreds of millions per year for years.
Just stop complaining so much, put your big boy pants on and confront the problem directly if it bothers you so much.
TL;DR nut up or shut up its really not that bad
#53
Posted 28 November 2017 - 02:22 AM
Why this game doesn't have any moderators? That's ****ing stupid.
#54
Posted 28 November 2017 - 02:35 AM
Run a supersonic milkshake smuggling airline instead.
Huh?
Watch your mouth!!! There are children here....
Says the one who tries getting under 13s banned and talks about drugs.
#55
Posted 28 November 2017 - 05:41 AM
Why this game doesn't have any moderators? That's ****ing stupid.
100%
__________________++
__________________.Eo
___________________zEE;_________________________:
____________________EEEn_____________________:oS;
_____________________EEEE:__:-_____-lcneEg+.*EE--
_____________________*EEOEOEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE-oOEV
____________:;;--+++-oEEOEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
__.:::::::.______::::__*CEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEglCS
_.:-+++++++oEECgr**ll*VEECCJJogOEEE::EE__:E
____________;nEE:_______+*El+E-.
Carlos "SUJETO" Vargas Sánchez.
#56
Posted 28 November 2017 - 09:22 AM
There's no abuse going on if any layman can copy the strategy, which the almighty Imperial has been extremely open about.
It's up to the coders to improve the game so the current Imperial strategy is no longer the best (never).
#57
Posted 03 December 2017 - 04:29 PM
The obvious improvement as I see it is to place a limit on hubs. The only thing we see is a 1 hub limit or no hublimit at all. If it was say a limit of 1 to maybe 5 at most, it would help this sort of thing from happening.
#58
Posted 03 December 2017 - 04:36 PM
At the moment. Many spam airlines were liquidated.
__________________++
__________________.Eo
___________________zEE;_________________________:
____________________EEEn_____________________:oS;
_____________________EEEE:__:-_____-lcneEg+.*EE--
_____________________*EEOEOEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE-oOEV
____________:;;--+++-oEEOEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
__.:::::::.______::::__*CEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEglCS
_.:-+++++++oEECgr**ll*VEECCJJogOEEE::EE__:E
____________;nEE:_______+*El+E-.
Carlos "SUJETO" Vargas Sánchez.
#59
Posted 03 December 2017 - 04:42 PM
Maybe we can create a world where all of those restrictions are in place so people like you guys who want to go for maximum realism can and enjoy the game that way. The fact of the matter is that some people, like me, enjoy making a version of a spamline (not quite the annoying max economy configurations and no IFE IFS but not a realistic airline either). I don't think putting restrictions on all the worlds would be a good thing and it would hurt the game and I probably wouldn't play it anymore. I'm sure I'm not the only one.
The only problem I have is people using the hub/connecting passengers bug, where you can set super high prices, make a place a hub, and overfill the demand to make ENORMOUS profits. I tried it with one route and made the equivalent of 20x the amount of money with that one route than with 20 equivalent routes under normal conditions. In my opinion, this is exploiting the system and these players should face a penalty, because it is impossible for the rest of us in the world to catch up to them.
#60
Posted 03 December 2017 - 04:49 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users