Sign In
Create Account
Hello.
After observing the sheer amount of new topics made, and seeing that nearly all of them are spam, I have come to this idea:
Limit the number of threads people can make to one per day if their account is under three years old.
I know that many members might be affected, but almost nobody would mind the limitation since they usually don't post even one thread per month. This would help reduce the spam from users who have been noted to create a large number of new topics in a short time period.
-
This topic is locked
#1
Posted 13 October 2017 - 07:02 AM
DWProski
-
- Member
-
- 403 posts
AE's (Former) Ambassador to Bosnia
Back to top
#2
Posted 13 October 2017 - 12:44 PM
#3
Posted 13 October 2017 - 04:24 PM
I support this even though I'm guilty of it. Personally I'd reduce my overcasting if marb1 reduced his so ya
#4
Posted 13 October 2017 - 04:41 PM
Jamesthomeson
-
- Member
-
- 451 posts
Desperate to Fly
"Limit the number of threads people can make to one per day if their account is under three years old." This is the only part I have a problem with. If this should be a rule, then it should apply to all players regardless of how long your account has been up.
#5
Posted 13 October 2017 - 04:48 PM
DWProski
-
- Member
-
- 403 posts
AE's (Former) Ambassador to Bosnia
"Limit the number of threads people can make to one per day if their account is under three years old." This is the only part I have a problem with. If this should be a rule, then it should apply to all players regardless of how long your account has been up.
Actually, I agree.
Despite making the initial statment apply more towards new people, I think it would be okay to apply it to everyone, even though I doubt a member would wait for three years to start spamming threads on a daily basis. Maybe only just have it increase to two after three years, but that is only an idea.
#6
Posted 13 October 2017 - 05:41 PM
Actually, I agree.
Despite making the initial statment apply more towards new people, I think it would be okay to apply it to everyone, even though I doubt a member would wait for three years to start spamming threads on a daily basis. Maybe only just have it increase to two after three years, but that is only an idea.
Yeah - that's fair enough. I agree.
#7
Posted 13 October 2017 - 09:21 PM
Tesla
-
- Member
-
- 2,392 posts
Inactive
I do not support this. We need more moderators. Not arbitrary FU's to new members who want to contribute or may need help
#8
Posted 14 October 2017 - 12:30 PM
I support this even though I'm guilty of it. Personally I'd reduce my overcasting if marb1 reduced his so ya
HEY! Plus most of my posts aren't starting my own threads! And you have way more posts than me!
#9
Posted 14 October 2017 - 01:22 PM
kingoftheskies
-
- Member
-
- 377 posts
I breathe SQ but not their fares :/
HEY! Plus most of my posts aren't starting my own threads! And you have way more posts than me!
Okay firstly, no one referred to you as the subject of the question. So why are you so worked up about this?
Secondly, the issue here is with threads, more specifically, irrelevant and extraneous threads which are not needed. So what's it about posts you're talking about?
Lastly, seeing that you're a new member, I would not continue being so defensive towards you and would like you to welcome you to the community (even though it's 7 months late). Your profile says you're 12, now I have no issues with age since I also started playing AE when I was 12, but I have to warn you the community now compared with the community then is hell lot of different. Different good or different bad you'll know. So I'll just give you an advice, before you post anything, reread what you've typed, and always, always be prepared for opposing views.
#10
Posted 16 October 2017 - 05:24 AM
What happened to this thread hahahaha
you replied to this thread, went back 12 hours later, saw no one had replied, and decided to reply again?
Yeah, you pile of fecal matter!
#11
Posted 16 October 2017 - 06:58 PM
Tesla
-
- Member
-
- 2,392 posts
Inactive
Yeah, you pile of fecal matter!
Calm your faeces. I don't want to become a powerless moderator on this thread. The behaviour of some people on this thread can be bettered by a 7 year old. Get your acts together
#12
Posted 17 October 2017 - 12:15 AM
Calm your faeces. I don't want to become a powerless moderator on this thread. The behaviour of some people on this thread can be bettered by a 7 year old. Get your acts together
Anyway, djsfjk
#14
Posted 17 October 2017 - 12:56 AM
zelalemon
-
- Member
-
- 116 posts
immature
Come on for goodness sake. I DON'T CARE!!!
*insert god damn thats edgy meme*
CLT, BOS, JFK, LGA, EWR, ALB, BDL, SYR, HPN, EWN, RDU, PHL, ATL, CVG, MCO, DCA, IAD, BWI, MDW, HOU, DFW, PHX, DEN, BZN, FAT, SAN, LAX, BUR, SBA, SFO, SEA, ANC, KOA, MTJ, MBJ, SXM, CUN, PVR, YVR, SJO, JNB, LLW, LGW
A319, A320, A321, A333, A346, B734, B738, B752, B762, CRJ2, CRJ7, CRJ9, E145, E170, E190, DH8B
AWE, AAL, DAL, UAL, SAA, SWA
#16
Posted 17 October 2017 - 07:06 AM
Come on for goodness sake. I DON'T CARE!!!
WELL FOR GOODNESS SAKE, CHECK THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS!!!
http://www.airline-e...tion=boardrules
#17
Posted 17 October 2017 - 08:01 AM
PingPong
-
- Member
-
- 1,206 posts
Dormant and Highly Sarcastic
Marb1: No profanity may be posted (including in the chat and game, e.g. airline names). This includes circumventing the swear filter in the forums and chat.
Member, Vice-President, and Website Developer of Universal Alliance
#18
Posted 17 October 2017 - 08:53 AM
Marb1: No profanity may be posted (including in the chat and game, e.g. airline names). This includes circumventing the swear filter in the forums and chat.
True. That was my point! It was Zortan that was swearing!
#19
Posted 17 October 2017 - 09:45 AM
PingPong
-
- Member
-
- 1,206 posts
Dormant and Highly Sarcastic
True. That was my point! It was Zortan that was swearing!
I think we can all count “Eat Feces” meant to be spelt “Faeces” as profanity.
Member, Vice-President, and Website Developer of Universal Alliance
#20
Posted 17 October 2017 - 10:10 AM
I think we can all count “Eat Feces” meant to be spelt “Faeces” as profanity.
It isn't. Even "cr*p" can be seen on the AE forums and same for "b*tch" (both uncensored by the swear filter)! But feces is a scientific term and is MOST DEFINITELY NOT A SWEAR WORD! In fact it is probably the MOST POLITE term to refer to fecal matter (compared to "poop", "cr*p" and the S word).
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
