Jump to content

Photo

Dealing With Spamlines and How To Increase Realism

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

#1
Geminijets 30

Geminijets 30

    Don't ask me

  • Member
  • 95 posts

After reading many of the chains on spamlines, I have seen many differing opinions on spam lines and how to stop or compete with spam lines.

Some people compare them to Low Cost Carriers (LCCs), while this may be accurate to some extent, it is not completely accurate. The largest LCC (Southwest Airlines) has a fleet of 715 Boeing 737 variants with 249 on order. The largest spamlines have over 10000 aircraft, and almost every major type of aircraft too. There is no saying that competing with a spamline is like competing with a LCC.

Some say spamlines are a product of capitalism, they are not. They are a product of basic AI passengers who have no or very little regard to the airlines service and only care about the ticket pricing. They are also the product of the ways hubs can influence passengers amounts. No airline in the real world would be able to operate fully booked flights between two regional airports with widebody aircraft, or honestly anything larger than a regional jet. The fact that hubs essentially create more passengers gives spamlines a way to operate and be spamlines. 

Spamlines are also easier to make because of the unrealistic amount of aircraft leasing, most airlines own some or most of their fleet, because leasing is uneconomical, but this is not the case in AE, lease prices would need to be raised in order to stop spamlines.

Many players are annoyed by spamlines and this issue needs to be fixed in order to create a realistic and competitive atmosphere in the games. Actually scheduling flights would be one way to deal with this issue, passengers would be more likely to take flights with shorter connection times and airlines could better utilize their aircraft, this would also repurpose hub usage. Passengers also need to be more influenced by service than price, this would include actually managing legroom, as the current way of configuring aircraft does not tell you how much legroom passengers have. Inflight service needs to be more valuable to passengers, one way to fix this is provide a more comprehensive breakdown of travelers, telling airlines what types of passengers are in the demand for a certain route, an example would be business travelers want their flights to match with their schedule which goes back to a previous point, people on vacation will want more service on their flight and may be willing to pay a bit extra, while some people who just need to get somewhere may choose the best price to a reasonable extent. Another thing to add would be more realistic delays, which could influence passengers, an example in the US is Spirit Airlines who is late and delayed quite often, compared to Southwest or Delta, who are on time a majority of the time.

One thing to think about is that if you saw an airline in the real world that sold tickets for $1, you would either know that its too good to be true, or that something is very wrong with that airline, such as their safety might be way below par, or they might not take you where they say. You would know something sketchy is going on, and you probably wouldn't fly with them.

Spamlines are not the product of anything but a game that needs major adjustments in order to create a feeling of realism.

 

(No one should complain about spamlines in sandbox worlds because that is literally what those worlds are made for) After reading many of the chains on spamlines, I have seen many differing opinions on spam lines and how to stop or compete with spam lines.

Some people compare them to Low Cost Carriers (LCCs), while this may be accurate to some extent, it is not completely accurate. The largest LCC (Southwest Airlines) has a fleet of 715 Boeing 737 variants with 249 on order. The largest spamlines have over 10000 aircraft, and almost every major type of aircraft too. There is no saying that competing with a spamline is like competing with a LCC.

Some say spamlines are a product of capitalism, they are not. They are a product of basic AI passengers who have no or very little regard to the airlines service and only care about the ticket pricing. They are also the product of the ways hubs can influence passengers amounts. No airline in the real world would be able to operate fully booked flights between two regional airports with widebody aircraft, or honestly anything larger than a regional jet. The fact that hubs essentially create more passengers gives spamlines a way to operate and be spamlines. 

Spamlines are also easier to make because of the unrealistic amount of aircraft leasing, most airlines own some or most of their fleet, because leasing is uneconomical, but this is not the case in AE, lease prices would need to be raised in order to stop spamlines.

Many players are annoyed by spamlines and this issue needs to be fixed in order to create a realistic and competitive atmosphere in the games. Actually scheduling flights would be one way to deal with this issue, passengers would be more likely to take flights with shorter connection times and airlines could better utilize their aircraft, this would also repurpose hub usage. Passengers also need to be more influenced by service than price, this would include actually managing legroom, as the current way of configuring aircraft does not tell you how much legroom passengers have. Inflight service needs to be more valuable to passengers, one way to fix this is provide a more comprehensive breakdown of travelers, telling airlines what types of passengers are in the demand for a certain route, an example would be business travelers want their flights to match with their schedule which goes back to a previous point, people on vacation will want more service on their flight and may be willing to pay a bit extra, while some people who just need to get somewhere may choose the best price to a reasonable extent. Another thing to add would be more realistic delays, which could influence passengers, an example in the US is Spirit Airlines who is late and delayed quite often, compared to Southwest or Delta, who are on time a majority of the time.

One thing to think about is that if you saw an airline in the real world that sold tickets for $1, you would either know that its too good to be true, or that something is very wrong with that airline, such as their safety might be way below par, or they might not take you where they say. You would know something sketchy is going on, and you probably wouldn't fly with them.

Spamlines are not the product of anything but a game that needs major adjustments in order to create a feeling of realism.

 

(No one should complain about spamlines in sandbox worlds because that is literally what those worlds are made for) 


 

 

 

 


#2
Geminijets 30

Geminijets 30

    Don't ask me

  • Member
  • 95 posts

This list by zortan proposes a lot of good ideas

 

 

I've made a list of things that would improve the game, in my opinion, and start to get rid of Spamlines:

  1. Scheduling - When you create a route - you have to set times and aircraft, as well as days of the week. That way - putting a route on a plane takes longer and would slow down expansion. Flights that are departed at ridiculous times (such as midnight-6Am) will get less passengers because of their frustrating departure times.
  2. Maintenance - Similar to scheduling - you need to plan your A, B, C, and D checks for your plane instead of just getting the bill. You must then schedule them for times that the plane isn't on a route, of course.
  3. Hubs - Airlines should only be able to create routes from their HQ airport at the start of their existence. After they've existed for some time (90-270 days or something), they will be able to open a new hub. Then, they can depart flights from both of their hubs. Then, they have to wait another 90 days (These are all game days, btw) to open the third hub, and so on. This would limit expansion and prohibit empty hubs as some spamlines do (hubbing every single city that is a destination!)
  4. Used Aircraft Delivery - When an airline sells an A/C, it has to be delivered from the location of the airline, which would take time. Therefore, all Used aircraft purchases should have a delivery time of 24 hours for removal of the old airline's branding, then the flight time from the other airline's hub to your chosen delivery location. That way, Spamlines can't just buy the entire used market and create an instant 1000 plane fleet. Another suggestion in the used aircraft is that you should only be allowed to buy 2 or so used aircraft every game day - this also limits expansion.
  5. Finances - bonds should become loans - then you can pay them off ahead of time. Also, starting cash should be about 30 million for airlines in R worlds and 175 million for airlines in the sandboxes. That way - with my used aircraft suggestions and the like, you don't run out of money waiting for aircraft to be delivered
  6. Chronological considerations - Templehoff airport and many other airports in AE close at some point. Therefore - they should. For the example of THF, it should open in 1923 and close in 2008 in the game worlds. Then there is demand. Demand at THF was up until the late 70's when it began to dwindle. Rather than just have random demand changes, demand should change as time goes on in the realistic airports. This should also change based on time around the world - Air Travel was less popular, believe it or not, in the 60's than it is today, so there should be less demand all around then.
  7. New aircraft production - Aircraft should use production slots. This is when a delivery for each aircraft can be made once a day, once a week, etc. The manufacturer would give delivery slots to carriers, and so when a carrier orders a lot, say 50 737-700s, they get maybe every 3 production slots for their planes. Then, if someone else came along and ordered just 5, they would get a few in the middle of the other airline's slots. That way, spamlines don't kill production for others, and they allow for consistent and planned aircraft deliveries.
  8. Weight Variants - some aircraft offer additional MTOW packages for an added cost that increase the range without putting in different engines - these would work well as another option
  9. IFS Additions: Baggage fees, carry-on fees, boarding pass printing fees (Spirit does this!), iPads, premium Economy
  10. Essential Air Service and the like. In the USA, the government pays some airlines such as Mokulele and Boutique Air to operate routes that would be unprofitable otherwise, such as to remote airports in alaska, as well as remote airports in the plains of the US. Other countries have similar systems - I think this would be good for airlines looking to expand their networks. Cities with no demand (Teterboro, etc.) can have an EAS implemented where the airline will be paid to construct a terminal and start at least x number of flights to the airport.

In the end - these are just my suggestions that might not get implemented, but I think that they would help the game tremendously in becoming more playable and more fun!


 

 

 

 


#3
bAnderson

bAnderson

    Timeless

  • Member
  • 2,139 posts

The problem with this and the several similar posts is that AE4 is so far off into the future that this becomes pointless. Yuxi has this list memorized I'm sure because even if this is a new compilation of old posts all grouped together he knows that these are here. He's hopelessly outnumbered with the things he has to do to maintain AE3.1, developing AE 4.0, basically a new game, is just too much for one or two people to do in a reasonable amount of time. He's trying his hardest I'm sure but the game is stagnant. The gallery, however, is the future and life of AE.


wgOP4y0.jpg


#4
Stevphfeniey

Stevphfeniey

    Bad m*****f*****

  • Member
  • 4,249 posts
  • Website:http://stevphfeniey.tumblr.com/
What if we just took spamlines and pushed them somewhere else?

please don't kill us we're just the aquabats

 

The Best Discord Server


#5
ЗЫРХ

ЗЫРХ

    OMGZ I LUUUUV AE!!!

  • Member
  • 694 posts
I classify this thread as spam.
 

 

 

 

 

 

BV6atB1.jpg


#6
zortan

zortan

    AE Winner

  • Member
  • 2,515 posts
  • Website:http://aeronauticsonline.com

I classify this thread as spam.

I wouldn't. Continuously posting over and over might get someone's attention.



#7
zortan

zortan

    AE Winner

  • Member
  • 2,515 posts
  • Website:http://aeronauticsonline.com

The problem with this and the several similar posts is that AE4 is so far off into the future that this becomes pointless. Yuxi has this list memorized I'm sure because even if this is a new compilation of old posts all grouped together he knows that these are here. He's hopelessly outnumbered with the things he has to do to maintain AE3.1, developing AE 4.0, basically a new game, is just too much for one or two people to do in a reasonable amount of time. He's trying his hardest I'm sure but the game is stagnant. The gallery, however, is the future and life of AE.

I know that Yuxi is overworked - which is why I went up to Yuxi and the rest of the AE staff and volunteered to work for them for free! I don't know if they'll let me - but if they do - you'll see some of these changes - I hope!



#8
Maestro69

Maestro69

    El Original Mod, AE Beta Tester

  • AE Moderator
  • 4,010 posts

User's Awards

3    3   

I classify this thread as spam.

 

I classify you as the AE class idiot.

 

And in regards to the topic of this thread, suggestions like these and stated above, have been posted, suggested, discussed and bashed to death, on these AE forums, since 2004. Hell, i suggest and discussed most the above matters during that time with fellow AE members and developers alike (yuxi wasnt the first dev to make this game).

 

I think what i have found, and this is not a direct shot at anyone, but Yuxi has perhaps found a confort zone in AE where perhaps the time needed to develop the game further (AE4) is not worth the effort (and also, considering that everyone here is much older, have jobs and might not have time spare to be as involved in the game as before). I would love to at least some of the suggestions that has been discussed over the past 13 years to be included in AE, but i personally just dont see it happening anytime soon.


dleLlDN.png?raw=1


#9
ЗЫРХ

ЗЫРХ

    OMGZ I LUUUUV AE!!!

  • Member
  • 694 posts
Note the only work on AE is... You know what, if I say one more "harsh" word, I get a "temporary ban" for "hurting feelings." Gotta love this community!
 

 

 

 

 

 

BV6atB1.jpg


#10
Maestro69

Maestro69

    El Original Mod, AE Beta Tester

  • AE Moderator
  • 4,010 posts

User's Awards

3    3   

Note the only work on AE is... You know what, if I say one more "harsh" word, I get a "temporary ban" for "hurting feelings." Gotta love this community!

 

God why do i even bother...

 

It is not about hurting feelings, its that you posted a useless and nuisance post, just so:

1. Get your post count up.

2. Make you feel important telling the OP that they should use the search function.

3. Provide no useful information to the thread but just to make you feel important.

 

So how about we start acting a bit more mature and give more appropriate answers? oh wait, that might be too hard.

 

So yea, keep bashing the person trying to keep things ¨civilised¨ on the AE forums.


dleLlDN.png?raw=1


#11
ЗЫРХ

ЗЫРХ

    OMGZ I LUUUUV AE!!!

  • Member
  • 694 posts
If you were actually "trying to keep things ¨civilised¨ on the AE forums," then I would have expected to have known about you well before my 7th or 8th month of activity on the AE Forums. Strange.
 

 

 

 

 

 

BV6atB1.jpg


#12
zortan

zortan

    AE Winner

  • Member
  • 2,515 posts
  • Website:http://aeronauticsonline.com

If you were actually "trying to keep things ¨civilised¨ on the AE forums," then I would have expected to have known about you well before my 7th or 8th month of activity on the AE Forums. Strange.

Please stop fighting guys - Just Chill.



#13
iquit

iquit

    AE Luver

  • Member
  • 296 posts

User's Awards

6       3    7   

Continuously posting over and over might get someone's attention.

That's exactly why attention seekers are ignored, so that everyone else has a fair share of expressing their concerns.



#14
Maestro69

Maestro69

    El Original Mod, AE Beta Tester

  • AE Moderator
  • 4,010 posts

User's Awards

3    3   

Please stop fighting guys - Just Chill.

 

This is not a fight. Trust me, i have dealt with worse.

 

Just I have a hard time tolerating people who just post useless stuff, because some new members on these forums do not search. Sure they may a mistake or naive thinking that what they are suggesting hasnt been before, but there is always a time and place to be polite and express to these said members that the suggestions have been suggested, discussed and some are to be implemented in AE4 (whenever that comes to fruition).


dleLlDN.png?raw=1


#15
zortan

zortan

    AE Winner

  • Member
  • 2,515 posts
  • Website:http://aeronauticsonline.com

This is not a fight. Trust me, i have dealt with worse.

 

Just I have a hard time tolerating people who just post useless stuff, because some new members on these forums do not search. Sure they may a mistake or naive thinking that what they are suggesting hasnt been before, but there is always a time and place to be polite and express to these said members that the suggestions have been suggested, discussed and some are to be implemented in AE4 (whenever that comes to fruition).

Yeah - OK - I get the point.



#16
Whirligig

Whirligig

    AE Player

  • Member
  • 93 posts

User's Awards

2      

I just want to point out that most of the points on the list above are directly taken from Airwaysim. 






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users