Jump to content

Photo

[UNDER DISCUSSION] Baade 152


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1
ЗЫРХ

ЗЫРХ

    OMGZ I LUUUUV AE!!!

  • Member
  • 694 posts
The Baade 152 is a pretty damn infamous East Germanic failed aircraft. It was intended to be used by Interflug, but only two flew. They sucked.
With that said, it would make sense why AE doesn't have it proposed yet. They were loud, ugly, and fuel guzzling birds, but on behalf of AE local commies, I will propose it.
All info found from http://www.skybird-e.../152/gp-152.htm(If you don't read german, sucks to be you), as well as https://en.m.wikiped.../wiki/Baade_152 (sources cited and fact checked except for the book cited).
Length-31.4 meters
Height- 9.53 meters
Wingspan- 26.3 meters
Wing area- 136 meters cubed
EW- 63,008 lbs
MTOW- 102,514 lbs
Engines- 4x Pirna 014
Max. Speed- 572 mph
Cruise Speed- 497 mph
Seat. Configuration- 48/52/72 Passengers
Range- 1553mi/1242mi/1242mi (depending on configuration)
Takeoff Run- 985 meters
Landing Run- 690 meters
Landing Speed- 200 km/h

Thanks,
Zy
 

 

 

 

 

 

BV6atB1.jpg


#2
ЗЫРХ

ЗЫРХ

    OMGZ I LUUUUV AE!!!

  • Member
  • 694 posts
And production began in 1958, the project was scrapped in 1961. My apologies for that, and the dramatic intro to the request. :-P
 

 

 

 

 

 

BV6atB1.jpg


#3
ЗЫРХ

ЗЫРХ

    OMGZ I LUUUUV AE!!!

  • Member
  • 694 posts
Nothing much, just this.
https://youtu.be/_cURB_AEoR4
 

 

 

 

 

 

BV6atB1.jpg


#4
ЗЫРХ

ЗЫРХ

    OMGZ I LUUUUV AE!!!

  • Member
  • 694 posts
So is this a bust? I have the feeling that this, nor any other decent requests, will be getting approved anytime soon.
 

 

 

 

 

 

BV6atB1.jpg


#5
ЗЫРХ

ЗЫРХ

    OMGZ I LUUUUV AE!!!

  • Member
  • 694 posts
Anyone?
 

 

 

 

 

 

BV6atB1.jpg


#6
Stevphfeniey

Stevphfeniey

    Bad m*****f*****

  • Member
  • 4,249 posts
  • Website:http://stevphfeniey.tumblr.com/

Implementing requests would require any sort of active development to the game, which we don't have


please don't kill us we're just the aquabats

 

The Best Discord Server


#7
ЗЫРХ

ЗЫРХ

    OMGZ I LUUUUV AE!!!

  • Member
  • 694 posts
Mmm, k
 

 

 

 

 

 

BV6atB1.jpg


#8
zortan

zortan

    AE Winner

  • Member
  • 2,515 posts
  • Website:http://aeronauticsonline.com

Well - Yuxi and them should focus on this!



#9
Oliy.

Oliy.

    You what?

  • Data Collector
  • 342 posts

User's Awards

     

If it didn't enter airline service it is not likely to be added.



#10
AlextheAviator

AlextheAviator

    Alex222

  • Member
  • 30 posts

wil possibly never get added mostly because of minimal development



#11
MrTrash

MrTrash

    AE Player

  • Data Manager
  • 93 posts

Torn in this one. It flew but never entered service, but was planned too.

Will need to review. Placing in "Discussion" status



#12
767holic

767holic

    AE Know It All

  • Member
  • 225 posts

User's Awards

3    4         

Torn in this one. It flew but never entered service, but was planned too.

Will need to review. Placing in "Discussion" status

 

If Baade 152 going to be passed despite that it never entered service, then there will be pretty lot of unsuccesful aircraft projects (the one that managed to fly / prototype but not entered service) that can be added too. Some similar examples are IPTN N250 series, Dornier 728(?), Mitsubishi SpaceJet, etc...

 

Yet in game a Tu-334 is available. It never entered service with any airline (but they did market it until SSJ entered service)


"Managing a real world airline is not as easy as you play Airline Empires. Real world airline are more and much more complicated"


#13
MrTrash

MrTrash

    AE Player

  • Data Manager
  • 93 posts

If Baade 152 going to be passed despite that it never entered service, then there will be pretty lot of unsuccesful aircraft projects (the one that managed to fly / prototype but not entered service) that can be added too. Some similar examples are IPTN N250 series, Dornier 728(?), Mitsubishi SpaceJet, etc...

Yet in game a Tu-334 is available. It never entered service with any airline (but they did market it until SSJ entered service)


This is what I am grappling with and why I’m leaning towards rejecting for now but adding to a list for AE4.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users