I dont think anybody running it should be able to compete in it TBH.
[VIRTUPOLITICS] ROUND ONE OFFICIAL VOTING
Started by Kirkland, Aug 22 2012 11:25 PM
#21
Posted 24 August 2012 - 03:25 PM
#22
Posted 24 August 2012 - 05:09 PM
Kitty there should be a runoff vote between agre and steve seeing as they are tied.
#23
Posted 24 August 2012 - 08:04 PM
Here's my take on the situation- anybody can run in the election (minus Kitty, Bilal and I), however realistic or non-realistic their campaign is. We do need to get a schedule up and running as well...
"We do what we must, because we can."
Reintroducing Ensemble Holdings, commencing operations Summer 2014.
#24
Posted 24 August 2012 - 08:33 PM
Yeah this particular election wasn't really set up well. And perhaps we could have an election between the many candidates as MF suggested, then the top 2 or 3 from that vote would go into a runoff vote, as Angus suggested. Also, as MF suggested, we could have a better schedule (ie, deadlines to enter, debates, an actual enforced block of time for voting). If we have those things this little project should be in good shape.
#25
Posted 24 August 2012 - 09:32 PM
#26
Posted 24 August 2012 - 09:38 PM
I am willing to assist, Agre and Kitty.
There goes CRAZY uncle Ron, BABBLING about the unsustainablity of multiple WARS. -Jon Stewart
#27
Posted 24 August 2012 - 11:21 PM
#28
Posted 24 August 2012 - 11:25 PM
We will be asking Yuxi for a subforum to host everything! yay!
SIDE NOTE:
1,000th post proudly achieved on 8/24/2012 at 6:25 PM!
SIDE NOTE:
1,000th post proudly achieved on 8/24/2012 at 6:25 PM!
#29
Posted 24 August 2012 - 11:28 PM
Agre you may not run the contest. All of the things you mentioned I had already planned for next round. I will be running a second round.
Maybe we could co-run it, considering school.
Alternatively, a competing political roleplay could be launched.
Administrator of UnitedSkies alliance
and also a member of some other ones, but they're 2vip4u
#30
Posted 24 August 2012 - 11:29 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users