Jump to content

Kicking Fare Plotters?

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1
Guest_737NGCapt_*

Guest_737NGCapt_*
  • Guests
You think it'd ever be possible to not allow an airline to fly a route if they place their fare dramaticly below or above the profit level of the market to the point where it kills the route not only for them, but the compeition? Or to atleast give them 0% load factor and no income and not affect the rest of the market? It really ruins the experience of the game for those who are coming into a 500$ fare route with HUGE profit and setting fare at 99$ and killing it... and never moving from there. I'm guessing if this were to be put into place, it'd be an easy bit of coding considering a similar code is in place for the aircraft sales??

#2
Pacific

Pacific

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 1,013 posts

User's Awards

2       2      
Price gouging unfortunately is part of real-world business. I say let it stay.

Stagecoach, a bus company in the UK is probably the most notorious. They ran paralell routes to their competitors at triple frequency for free until the competition went bust. Only then did they charge fares.

They also mimicked the timetables of the competition and used unmarked double deckers to block their busses so that the Stagecoach vehicle stays ahead, thus picking up all the passengers.

Sad but true.

[Edited on 6/7/2005 by Pacific]

#3
drv4truk

drv4truk

    AE Winner

  • Veteran
  • 2,273 posts
:( Sorry, but it is the market. It is fair or not fair depending on how you look at it. They are hoping to push everyone away so they can take over that route. Consider the way airlines have fair wars. They may make very little or even lose money on a route just to compete with the competition. But, in the RW, airlines receive some compensation from hotels, car rentals, etc. if they bring in the people. Unfortunately you do not get this benefit, so you will have to live with it.

#4
Guest_737NGCapt_*

Guest_737NGCapt_*
  • Guests
Well.. i've seen that happening... and its a great biz strat...but many of these airlines are those lil kids who make it a weekend project and then forget about it. There has to be some way to limit it tho with such high fare routes where its all the way up at 500$ and they set 99$ and the airline is never to be heard from again. Maybe atleast make a time limit on how long that fare can stay until it goes into "idle" and makes nothing and stops affecting the market...

[[Edit]]
An to be back into the market, require the member to make a fare change (like adding 1$ to the fare)...

[Edited on 6/7/2005 by 737NGCapt]

#5
doug_Or

doug_Or

    AE Addict

  • Veteran
  • 896 posts
I had suggested previously forceing airlines into bankruptcy. If airilnes were out of cash and creidt, losing money on a monthly basis, their assests would be liquidated. That way competition killers and idle airlines won't hurt active and honest players.

#6
Guest_Nathaniel_*

Guest_Nathaniel_*
  • Guests
thats actually a good idea.. becasue they would be forced to leave :(

#7
Chicken

Chicken

    Member

  • Member
  • 291 posts
Dear 737NGCapt. One feature that I like in this game, and one that I hope never goes away, is figuring out how to successfully compete with maniacs and idiots, in addition to figuring out how to successfully compete with brilliant strategical and tactical airline thinkers.

If I wanted to only play against "normal" competition, I would play something like Airline Tycoon, where the computer is pre-programmed to perfrom in a certain way. Once I figure out that logic, I can always win.

Competing against maniacs and idiots is different. Do I wait for them to self destruct? Do I try to accelerate the process? Do I try to "help" them, so I can assist them in annoying someone else? Do I just ignore them? Do I intentionally avoid them? Do I become one of them? Do I become one of them and join them?

So, 737NGCapt, if you honestly expect me to stand by and do nothing while you build you empire uninterrupted, well, I am sorry, but that will never happen. I may ignore you, I may fight you, I may join you, but I will never stand by and do nothing. I do not expect my fellow competitors to do the same, and I would be disappointed if they did.

#8
Guest_737NGCapt_*

Guest_737NGCapt_*
  • Guests

Originally posted by Chicken
Dear 737NGCapt. One feature that I like in this game, and one that I hope never goes away, is figuring out how to successfully compete with maniacs and idiots, in addition to figuring out how to successfully compete with brilliant strategical and tactical airline thinkers.

If I wanted to only play against "normal" competition, I would play something like Airline Tycoon, where the computer is pre-programmed to perfrom in a certain way. Once I figure out that logic, I can always win.

Competing against maniacs and idiots is different. Do I wait for them to self destruct? Do I try to accelerate the process? Do I try to "help" them, so I can assist them in annoying someone else? Do I just ignore them? Do I intentionally avoid them? Do I become one of them? Do I become one of them and join them?

So, 737NGCapt, if you honestly expect me to stand by and do nothing while you build you empire uninterrupted, well, I am sorry, but that will never happen. I may ignore you, I may fight you, I may join you, but I will never stand by and do nothing. I do not expect my fellow competitors to do the same, and I would be disappointed if they did.


Im not saying i want to build an empire uninterupted, i welcome the compeition. An airline is only as good as the compeition they beat. In this case, maybe consider deleting accounts then that are innactive and for those who know they will be away, allow them to request an LOA and for their airline to not be deleted...

#9
Sunshine Airways CEO

Sunshine Airways CEO

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 568 posts

User's Awards

5    5      
because there is no real bankruptcy atm, some people decide to do that to anger some of the people actually playing the game.

#10
Chicken

Chicken

    Member

  • Member
  • 291 posts

...some people decide to do that to anger some of the people actually playing the game.

My friend, the fact that I inhale is going to anger some of the people actually playing the game (and it does not bother me at all).

And I hope "actually playing the game" is more than getting planes, getting gates, and scheduling planes. That is boring.

No, I like the competition, no matter what form it takes. If it is temporary, bad, silly, real, good, tough, even cheating - I like it. It makes me think, makes me look for a better way, and makes my Airline Empire better.

And if someone gets angry, well, don't get angry, get even. And getting even takes many forms. For example, last game before the reset, some "idiots" had entered the BWI-LGA market, and were offering about 100 flights per day at $0. I put one plane on that route, set my fare to $40, and waited for them to go away. As long as my fare was $40, they were not going to make much money on that route. At the end, I was making about $2000 per day on that market, and with 11 slots at both BWI and LGA, it had to be a money loser, but I believe it was the best thing to do.

So, please do not take away my ability to fight idiots. They definitely make the game more interesting.

#11
Mexicana757

Mexicana757

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 148 posts
  • AIM Screen Name:dperez757
  • Yahoo ID:trekkerr757
I agree with what Mr. Chicken says. Fight back these people the best way you can think of. I too have had to fly routes where someone decides to come and dump the price. I kept flyin on my route, even though I was losing.

Many people will do this to drive others of the route so they can get the gates.

#12
Jevans19

Jevans19

    Member

  • Member
  • 31 posts

Originally posted by doug_Or
I had suggested previously forceing airlines into bankruptcy. If airilnes were out of cash and creidt, losing money on a monthly basis, their assests would be liquidated. That way competition killers and idle airlines won't hurt active and honest players.

I think this is a great idea, and I think it should be put to use. I know some people are douche bags and want to ruin it for others (please don't flame me, Chicken) by charging fares that they won't make any money with. I mean if you're going to try to make money, you don't need to have a $400 cheaper fare than your competition, hell, $25 works for me.

#13
Chicken

Chicken

    Member

  • Member
  • 291 posts
If anyone flames me, I will be Flame Grilled Chicken.:(:P

#14
botachelli

botachelli

    Member

  • Member
  • 32 posts
No chicken, you are just being competitive. They don't understand

Jorge
JetBuc Airlines

#15
drv4truk

drv4truk

    AE Winner

  • Veteran
  • 2,273 posts
I agree with Chicken. It does provide for an interesting challenge. Either deal with it or you can move on, which is exactly what they want you to do. They are not making any money.

One thing that might help is after going so far in the red, an airline should automatically go bankrupt. That would help fend off those that set it up and forget it. Maybe $30M or more. I know I just came out of the red from $23M after ordering planes, so it should be low enough not to effect those that are actually working our airlines.

#16
Sunshine Airways CEO

Sunshine Airways CEO

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 568 posts

User's Awards

5    5      
once a companies liabilities exceede their assets (company has negative net worth) they are bankrupt. Just that bankruptcy has not been added to the game yet.

especially when the signup was open, new airlines would pop up flying max freq at $1 or $0. very annoying.

#17
Guest_Jetsgo_*

Guest_Jetsgo_*
  • Guests
Well, like it or love it, real world airlines do this quite frequently, in Canada for sure. Dont know about other areas. Prime example, Jetsgo, even though they are bankrupt, they did survive for 2 years with there annual "Loonie Sundays" where flights would be 1$CDN. Also throwing the occasional $0.01CDN into the mix every now and again. Another example would be the Canjet "Loonie Websaver" fares. They, however, are still fully functional and a ver succesful expanding airline. This kind of thing does happen and whether you like it or not I think there is no avoiding it. Now a days competitive fares have been taken to a new level!:cool:

#18
ziliu

ziliu

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 281 posts
  • Website:http://bea.xmgfree.com

Originally posted by Jevans19

Originally posted by doug_Or
I had suggested previously forceing airlines into bankruptcy. If airilnes were out of cash and creidt, losing money on a monthly basis, their assests would be liquidated. That way competition killers and idle airlines won't hurt active and honest players.

I think this is a great idea, and I think it should be put to use. I know some people are douche bags and want to ruin it for others (please don't flame me, Chicken) by charging fares that they won't make any money with. I mean if you're going to try to make money, you don't need to have a $400 cheaper fare than your competition, hell, $25 works for me.


I second the motion (or maybe it should be third??? :(). There are way too many "idle" airlines which aren't seen after. But at the same time, if a player is deliberately dumping prices, knows it, does it in order to (somehow) gain either short or long term financial advantages, and really looks after the airline I would agree with Chicken. This is the way a market economy works, and it is an apect of Ae that makes it much more flexible and enjoyable.

[Edited on 6/8/2005 by ziliu]




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users